⑴ 克隆的利与弊英语作文
My View on Clone
With the repid development of technology, clone comes to the world. It can plicate creature, which means it can make contribution to the proction. People can pay a little and get a lot in the end. However, it also has disavantages. I think as the development of the high-tech, people can use clone to humen beings. It’s so horrible for me to know that there is someone the same with me. But in general, clone has more advantages than disadvantages.
⑵ 克隆的好处英文版
克隆是抄英文"clone"或"cloning"的音译，而英文"clone"则起源于希腊文"Klone"，原意是指以幼苗或嫩枝插条，以无性繁殖或营养繁殖的方式培育植物，如扦插和嫁接。在大陆译为“无性繁殖”，在台湾与港澳一般意译为复制或转殖或群殖。 中文也有更加确切的词表达克隆，“无性繁殖”、“无性系化”以及“纯系化”。克隆是指生物体通过体细胞进行的无性繁殖，以及由无性繁殖形成的基因型完全相同的后代个体组成的种群。通常是利用生物技术由无性生殖产生与原个体有完全相同基因的个体或种群。
克隆也可以理解为复制、拷贝和翻倍（港澳台的意译），就是从原型中产生出同样的复制品，它的外表及遗传基因与原型完全相同，但大多行为 思想不同。时至今日，“克隆”的含义已不仅仅是“无性繁殖”，凡是来自同一个祖先，无性繁殖出的一群个体，也叫“克隆”。这种来自同一个祖先的无性繁殖的后代群体也叫“无性繁殖系”，简称无性系。简单讲就是一种人工诱导的无性繁殖方式。但克隆与无性繁殖是不同的。克隆是指人工操作动物繁殖的过程，无性繁殖是指：不经过两性生殖细胞的结合由母体直接产生新个体的生殖方式，常见的有孢子生殖、被子生殖出芽生殖和分裂生殖。
⑶ 求克隆的好处与坏处（英文）
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
But cloning still has some problems. The scientists found that the cloning animal’ Gene has a little different from the original animal. So the life will shorter than the real life. The fact proved that, the cloning sheep Dolly has died. It only has the half life of the common sheep.
⑷ 克隆的好处和坏处 英文
The advantages and disadvantages of cloning
⑸ 用英文描述克隆技术的好处
The Problems of Cloning
Since March 1997, the birth of a cloned sheep, named Dolly, has caused a great sensation around the world. Though it was not the first time that the experiment using cloning succeeded, the reason why Dolly shocked the world was that she was the first clone from a cell of an alt mammal, something previously thought to be impossible. This meant that the possibility of cloning human beings was increased. For fear of realizing human cloning, a lot of countries have taken necessary measures to regulate the study of it. Some people, such as scientists in this field and certain infertile couples, are now arguing against banning it. But I think we should ban human cloning because it has a possibility to rece the value of our life, to take away indiviality in our society, and to destroy the moral and social systems human have long cultivated.
Richard Seed, a physicist who supports human cloning, said in a radio interview that he would open a clinic of human cloning for infertile people and make a big profit (Hotwired Japan). If human cloning is allowed, there would be so many people such as Seed, who use cloning technology to make money. The business operating the technology looks so profitable because according to a report, there could be 100,000 or so women in the U.S. who would like a similar chance to use cloning to have their own babies (Watson). Probably, they do not care how much money they pay to have their own blood-related babies. To allow human cloning creates a world where we could get life with money. Buying life rece the value of it because we cannot respect things which we can get easily. It could lead to the increase of murder. And it would be possible that someday at a department store we can buy life that is labeled, "ON SALE!"
There are many people in the world who do anything for the sake of money. As a result, cloning technology is in danger of being abused. First, I think I should explain how to clone humans. In the simplest language, cloning is the process in which the DNA from some cell of a body is put by electrical shock into a female egg cell whose DNA has been removed. Then the egg cell is implanted into a womb, and after that it grows as same as a natural baby does. The problem is that there is absolutely no reason why the egg cell need be implanted into the same woman who offers DNA. Hence it might be connected with abuses, such as a black market of egg cells or a black company offering surrogate mothers. Watson pointed out that because many women suffer from anatomical complications which prohibit successful childbearing, they might try to find a suitable surrogate mother. And he also insists that women who just do not like the discomforts of pregnancy might use cloning technology. In this point, human cloning is no longer developed for only infertile people but also for lazy women.
As I explained in the previous paragraph, cloning needs the DNA of only one person. Dr. Ian Wilmut in Roslin Institute, where Dolly was proced, claims that we should use the word, "ing," for reproction of a human instead of "cloning" (Otsuka 1). He has investigated cloning technology in order to proce milk which contains a human protein for premature babies, not to clone humans (Begley 47). Human cloning would create plication of humans, and the indiviality of each human would be lost. Someone may oppose the idea saying that the environment in which a person grow largely contributes the formation of his personality, however, his appearance would be completely the same as the original. Someone may contend that twins have the same appearance and are accepted. However, making twins restricts the indiviality artificially, not naturally. Natural and artificial are very different. We should separate them.
I doubt whether a human conceived by cloning will be treated as same as the others. In a present school situation where bullying is an everyday occurrence, the fact of being a clone may be a factor of being bullied. And it is possible that a cloned human would be dependent and inferior existence to the original. We would most likely think a clone is kind of a of the original rather than a kind of twin because of the disparity in age. Thus human cloning is an invasion of privacy for the human conceived by cloning. We should consider human cloning in that light. We do not have a right to take away the originality of any human - even a clone.
Of course, there are advantages to develop cloning technology. Ian Wilmut demands that the study of it not to be banned, emphasizing that the technology would be useful for the development of treatment for genetic diseases and of mass proction of good cattle which will be surely needed in the future when population is larger than today (Otsuka 1). Meanwhile, he opposes human cloning for moral reasons. Human cloning will make family system even worse than it is at the present. Because cloning needs only one DNA, and it does not matter whether a man or a woman offers it, we can easily imagine that there will be much more single-parent families. If a man wants to have a baby by himself, he can have one, offering his DNA to a surrogate mother. In other words, children conceived by cloning cannot have both blood-related father and mother. Even if it is okay for a parent, it is very hard for the child. We may anticipate that juvenile delinquents would increase at higher rate than now.
Some religions would be badly damaged for the reason that the belief that God give a birth to human would be destroyed. Mark D. Eibert, an attorney at law, argues that religious thinking should not be an excuse of banning things since all people in a country do not believe one specific religion. I agree with this point; however, we should not ignore religions completely. In fact there are some countries where one religion play an important role. Likewise, I suppose that human cloning would create a society where science technology controls everything even our birth. According to Watson, cloning technology might allow us to choose which baby we have, a boy or a girl. The technology will influence so many things in so many fields.
By permitting cloning of human, too many problems would occur. I can understand that the research of human cloning will help infertility. But I attach more importance to the value of our lives, indiviality, and bond of a family than curing minor number of people. Eibert strongly insists that the government should not make cloning of human illegal. He claimed that everyone has the right to have his baby and it is a freedom which the government cannot infringe. I opposed this opinion and the government should intervene in this kind of dispute. I wonder who else except the government can make the scientists think calmly and tell them to stop improving the technology that has a possibility of breaking rules in our society. I insist that cloning of human should not be done.
⑹ 克隆好处英文版
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
Of course, there still remains much more disadvantages of the application of cloning reproction of human being and animals. We should be extremely cautious of what we do and thus remember we will sure be respondible for all the results created
⑺ 急需一篇关于‘克隆人对我们的好处“的英语作文，大约在120到150字左右的。要俩篇，谢谢
Clone to our advantage
On medicine has the advantage, although there are a lot of disadvantages clone but it can also make many infertile men completed dream
Now the cloning scientific divided into therapeutic cloning sexual and reproctive cloning two kinds. The former is the use of embryonic stem cells cloned human organs, for medical research, to solve the organ transplant donor shortage problem, this is the international scientific community and ethical within both support, but there is a premise, is used for therapeutic cloning embryos cannot exceed 14 days of pregnancy the boundaries. For reproctive cloning sex, what say normally namely clone, e to its overall violated the life of ethical principles, so, scientists mainstream consensus is firmly opposed. UNESCO, the world health organization and the international human genome ethics committees and governments are also very clear that oppose reproctive sex cloning
Modern science and technology is a double-edged sword, in its benefit mankind can also bring some negative effects. This is kindled against us raises a question: modern technology, especially the modern life science and technology, don't respect ethical principle, will not listen to the voice of ethics? Professor shen pointed out: now some scientists propose, as long as science might do, you should do it. In fact, this is mistaken. If technology, we can proce a kind of serious harm to humans super life, difficult way can also go to manufacture? Some scientific lunatic is under the banner of "scientific freedom", to do some harm to humans. Therefore, we should guard modern science and technology by some ax-grinders utilization. In addition, nor make scientific freedom and ethical contradiction. The modern life science development suggests, ethical standard and guide, and no beam, listen to the voice of ethics, concive to scientific more healthy, smooth development
1．会使地球人数增多
2．在医学上有好处,克隆人虽然有很多坏处但它也可以使许多没有生育能力的人完成梦想
3．现在科学界把克隆分为治疗性克隆和生殖性克隆两种。前者是利用胚胎干细胞克隆人体器官，供医学研究、解决器官移植供体不足问题，这是国际科学界和伦理学界都支持的，但有一个前提，就是用于治疗性克隆的胚胎不能超出妊娠14天这一界限。而对于生殖性克隆，即通常所说的克隆人，由于它在总体上违背了生命伦理原则，所以，科学家的主流意见是坚决反对的。联合国教科文组织、世界卫生组织和国际人类基因组伦理委员会和各国政府也都非常明确地表示，反对生殖性克隆
4．现代科学技术是一把双刃剑，在其造福人类的同时也会带来一些负面效应。这就向我们提出了一个问题：现代科技，特别是现代生命科技，要不要尊重伦理学原则，要不要倾听伦理的声音？沈教授指出：现在有些科学家提出，只要科学上有可能做到的，就应该去做。事实上，这是错误的观点。如果技术上我们能制造出一种严重危害人类的超级生命，难道也可以去制造吗？一些科学狂人正是打着“科学自由”的旗号，去做一些危害人类的事。因此，我们要警惕现代科学技术被一些别有用心的人利用。另外，也不能把科学自由和伦理道德对立起来。现代生命科学发展的事实表明，伦理的规范和引导，并没有束，倾听伦理的声音，有利于科学更健康、顺利地发展
⑻ 克隆的好处英文
可以使一些濒临灭绝的动物得以种族延续，并在医学上有好处，克隆人虽然有很多坏处但它也可以使许多没有生育能力的人完成梦想现在科学界把克隆分为治疗性克隆和生殖性克隆两种。前者是利用胚胎干细胞克隆人体器官，供医学研究、解决器官移植供体不足问题，这是国际科学界和伦理学界都支持的，但有一个前提，就是用于治疗性克隆的胚胎不能超出妊娠14天这一界限。而对于生殖性克隆，即通常所说的克隆人，由于它在总体上违背了生命伦理原则，所以，科学家的主流意见是坚决反对的。联合国教科文组织、世界卫生组织和国际人类基因组伦理委员会和各国政府也都非常明确地表示，反对生殖性克隆。 Can make some of the endangered animals continue to race, and medical benefits of human cloning, in spite of many disadvantages, but it can also make many people unable to have children now dream of the completion of the scientific community to be divided into therapeutic cloning and reproctive cloning Two types of cloning. The former is the use of embryonic stem cell cloning of human organs for medical research to address the shortage of donor organ transplants, which is the international scientific community and the ethics community support, but there is a premise that is used for therapeutic cloning of embryos pregnancy can not exceed 14 The limits of the day. As for reproctive cloning, known as human cloning, since it generally goes against the principles of bioethics, so the scientists, the mainstream opinion is strongly against it. UNESCO, the World Health Organization and the International Human Genome Ethics Commission and the governments are very clear that opposition to reproctive cloning.
⑼ 克隆的好处英语作文
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
Of course, there still remains much more disadvantages of the application of cloning reproction of human being and animals. We should be extremely cautious of what we do and thus remember we will sure be respondible for all the results created by ourselves!!!
So how do u think about it?
请采纳
如果你认可我的回答，敬请及时采纳，
~如果你认可我的回答，请及时点击【采纳为满意回答】按钮
~~手机提问的朋友在客户端右上角评价点【满意】即可。
~你的采纳是我前进的动力
~~O(∩_∩)O，记得好评和采纳，互相帮助
⑽ 关于英语作文克隆的好处与坏处100字
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
Of course, there still remains much more disadvantages of the application of cloning reproction of human being and animals. We should be extremely cautious of what we do and thus remember we will sure be respondible for all the results created by ourselves!!!