① 关于打电话的英语对话作文。
K:
who
is
this
？
凯西:这是谁?
L:This
is
LiuHong.
May
i
speak
to
Mr
K
?
李:这是LiuHong。我可以和K先生说话吗?
K:Speaking.
凯西:说话。
L:i
hope
i
donot
disturb
you.
we
are
very
glad
to
invite
you
to
partipate
in
our
English
discusting
in
our
school
on
friday
moring
.
are
you
available
?
我希望我不要打扰你。我们很高兴邀请你参加partipate在周五早上我们学校不我们的英语恶心。你可用吗?
K:sorry.
i
canot
hear
you
clearly
？
pardon
？
凯西:对不起。我不能听清楚你?再说一遍?
L:
OK.
I
say
I
invite
you
to
go
our
school
for
English
Discussion
on
Friday
moring
。
L:好吧。我说我邀请你去我们学校周五早上英语讨论。
K:
oh.
that
is
fine.
I
will
be
on
time
.
凯西:哦。这是很好。我将准时。
L:
thank
you.
See
you
friday.
李:谢谢你。星期五见。
K:see
you
.
凯西:见到你。
② 英语对话作文
“Don't scientists have a responsibility to use animals in order to find cures for human diseases?”
Ecating people and encouraging them to avoid fat and cholesterol, quit smoking, rece alcohol and other drug consumption, exercise regularly, and clean up the environment will save more human lives and prevent more human suffering than all the animal tests in the world. Animal tests are primitive, and modern technology and human clinical tests are much more effective and reliable.
Even if we had no alternative to using animals, which is not the case, animal testing would still be ethically unacceptable. As George Bernard Shaw once said, “You do not settle whether an experiment is justified or not by merely showing that it is of some use. The distinction is not between useful and useless experiments, but between barbarous and civilized behaviour.” After all, there are probably some medical problems that can only be cured by testing on unwilling humans, but we don’t conct such tests because we recognize that it would be wrong to do so.
“If we didn’t use animals, wouldn’t we have to test new drugs on people?”
The choice isn’t between animals and people. There is no guarantee that drugs are safe—even if they have been tested on animals—because the physiological differences between humans and other animals prevent the results of animal tests from being accurately extrapolated to humans. Some drugs that have been approved through animal tests can cause serious and unexpected side effects for humans. A 2002 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that in the last 25 years, more than 50 FDA-approved drugs had to be taken off the market or relabeled because they caused “adverse reactions.” In 2000 alone, the prescription drugs removed from the market were the popular heartburn drug Propulsid (removed because it caused “fatal heart rhythm abnormalities”), the diabetes drug Rezulin (“removed after causing liver failure”), and the irritable-bowel-syndrome treatment Lotronex (“removed for causing fatal constipation and colitis”). According to the study’s lead author, “Millions of patients are exposed to potentially unsafe drugs each year.”
If the pharmaceutical instry switched from animal experiments to quantum pharmacology and in vitro tests, we would be better protected from harmful drugs, not less protected.
“If we didn’t test on animals, how would we conct medical research?”
Human clinical and epidemiological studies, studies on cadavers, and computer simulations are faster, more reliable, less expensive, and more humane than animal tests. Ingenious scientists have used human brain cells to develop a model “microbrain” that can be used to study tumors and have also come up with artificial skin and bone marrow. Instead of killing animals, we can now test irritancy on egg membranes, proce vaccines from cell cultures, and perform pregnancy tests using blood samples. As Gordon Baxter, cofounder of Pharmagene Laboratories—a company that uses only human tissue and computers to develop and test its drugs—says, “If you have information on human genes, what’s the point of going back to animals?”
“Doesn't animal experimentation help animals by advancing veterinary science?”
The point is not whether animal experimentation can be useful to animals or humans; the point is that we do not have the moral right to inflict unnecessary suffering on those who are at our mercy. Saying that it’s acceptable to experiment on animals to advance veterinary science is like saying that it’s acceptable to experiment on poor children to benefit rich ones.
“Don’t medical students have to dissect animals?”
No, they don’t. In fact, more and more medical students are becoming conscientious objectors who choose to learn by assisting experienced surgeons instead of by using animals. In Great Britain, it is against the law for medical students to practice surgery on animals, and British physicians are just as competent as those who were ecated elsewhere. Many of the leading U.S. medical schools, including Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, now use innovative, clinical teaching methods instead of cruel animal laboratories. Harvard, for instance, offers a cardiac-anesthesia practicum in which students observe human heart bypass operations instead of performing terminal surgery on dogs. The Harvard staff members who developed this practicum have recommended that it be implemented elsewhere.
“Should we throw out all the drugs that were developed and tested on animals? Would you refuse to take them?”
Unfortunately, a number of things in our society came about through the exploitation of others. For instance, many of the roads that we drive on were built by slaves. We can’t change the past; those who have already suffered and died are lost. But what we can do is change the future by using non-animal research methods from now on.
“Don't scientists care about the animals they experiment on? Doesn't their research depend on the animals’ well-being?”
Investigations at even the most prestigious institutions show that this is simply not the case. At the City of Hope in California, one of the country’s most prominent research facilities, animals starved to death and drowned in their own feces. Many experimenters become calloused after years of research and don’t see the animals’ suffering. They treat animals like disposable tools and consider proper animal care to be too expensive.
“Don't peer-review and animal-care committees prevent animal cruelty at institutions?”
No, because many such committees are composed mainly or completely of people who have vested interests in the continuation of animal experimentation. Members of the public were not allowed access to committee meetings until lawsuits were filed.
“Cats and dogs are killed in pounds anyway, so why not let them be used in experiments to save lives?”
A painless death at an animal shelter is a far cry from a life of severe pain and deprivation and an agonizing death in a laboratory.
“Would you support an experiment that would sacrifice 10 animals to save 10,000 people?”
No. Look at it another way: Suppose that the only way to save 10,000 people was to experiment on one mentally challenged orphan. If saving people is the goal, wouldn’t that be worth it? Most people would agree that it would be wrong to sacrifice one human for the “greater good” of others because it would violate that indivial’s rights, but when it comes to sacrificing animals, the assumption is that human beings have rights and animals do not. Yet there is no logical reason to deny animals the same rights that protect indivial humans from being sacrificed for the common good.
“What about experiments in which animals are observed and not harmed?”
If there really is no harm, we don’t object. But “no harm” means that animals aren’t isolated in barren, cold steel cages because even confinement causes stress and fear, as shown by the differences in blood pressure between caged and free animals. Caged animals also suffer because they are prevented from performing their normal behaviors and social interactions.
“If you were in a fire and could save either your child or your dog, who would you choose?”
I would save my child, but that’s just instinct. A dog would save her pup. Regardless, my choice proves nothing about the moral legitimacy of animal experiments. I might save my own child instead of my neighbor’s, but that hardly proves that experimentation on my neighbor’s child is acceptable.
“Why Should Animals Have Rights?”
Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth—a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. We believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. For more information, click here.
EU proposes to strengthen protection of animals used in scientific experiments
The European Commission on Wednesday proposed legislation to strengthen the protection of animals used in scientific experiments and to minimize the number of animals being tested on.
The proposal, which intends to strengthen existing European Union (EU) legislation, asks ethical evaluations to be carried out before projects using animals are authorized and lays down minimum requirements on housing and animal care.
The proposed directive covers all live non-human vertebrate animals plus certain other species likely to experience pain. The use of non-human primates is subject to restrictions, and the use of great apes -- chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans -- is banned in scientific proceres. Only when survival of the species itself is at stake, or in the case of an unexpected outbreak of a life-threatening or debilitating disease in human beings, can a member state exceptionally be granted permission for their use.
The proposal seeks to ensure that animals are used only where no other means are available. Their use must be fully justifiable and the expected benefits must outweigh the harm caused to the animals. The proposal would also ensure that animals receive suitable care and treatment such as appropriately sized cages and an environment adapted to each species.
The proposal would also require projects involving animals to be authorized by a competent authority before they can go ahead. Organizations wishing to breed, supply or use animals would be obliged to seek authorization for their activities and for the personnel working with the animals.
"It is absolutely important to steer away from testing on animals. Scientific research must focus on finding alternative methods to animal testing, but where alternatives are not available the situation of animals still used in experiments must be improved," said EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas.
③ 英语对话作文求帮忙！
A: Hello
B: Hello,this is 你的名字（例如Andy） is 打给对方人的名字（Alice） there？
A：Speaking
B：oh。hi Alice，Im calling to ask if youd like to swim。
A：That sounds good。When？
B: How about this Friday？
A：How about this sunday？
B：OK
A:See
B：bye
如果版有什么问题的权话~可以继续向我提问
---------------------------------------------
---如果满意记得及时采纳谢谢------
---------------------------------------------
④ 简单英语对话作文带翻译
marry：hello!paul
lucy.
paul
lucy:hi!marry.
marry：how
was
your
weekends？
paul：it
is
too
boring，i
did
my
homework
and
watched
tv
the
whole
days.
lucy：oh！it
is
terrible！i
was
lucky，i
went
to
the
aquarium
with
my
brother，i
saw
many
seals
and
sharks.
marry：it
is
wonderful！
paul：how
about
you，mary？
marry：it
was
boring，too.
lucy：how
bad
the
weekends
you
have！
翻译：
marry：露西，保罗，你们好！
paul
lucy：玛丽
你好！
marry：你们的周末怎么样？
paul：我的周末很无聊，我整天都在做我的家庭作业和看电视。
lucy：太可怜了，我比较幸运，我和我的哥哥去了水族馆，我看见了许多的海豹和鲨鱼。
marry：太精彩了！
paul：玛丽，你的周末怎么样呢？
marry：一样很无聊。
lucy：你们过了多么糟糕的周末啊！
就只有过去式，还有个感叹句，单词学到第8单元就可以了
⑤ 英语对话作文
问号与感叹号
这是三个从问号到感叹号的思考过程。
第一个问号是，为什么语文考不出一百分?
记得我上一年级时，特别喜欢上语文课，沈老师常表扬我拼音基础打得牢，考试常常一百分。可是，不知道为什么，到了三年级下，成绩渐渐下降，不要说考一百分，能考出九十五分已十分难得，尽管如此，爸爸仍然鼓励我，当我考试有进步时，他就显得格外兴奋，晚饭时一定要喝上二两。我也曾经十分苦恼，为什么考试越来越难呢?冷静地想一想，分析原因，我认为主要是三年级开始有了作文，作文能得满分几乎不太可能，另外，从考试卷上看，基础部分扣分较多，这与我基础打得不牢有关。词语掌握不够全面，积累少;语文预习不扎实，有时图速度快，囫囵吞枣。
第二个问号是，为什么数学考不出一百分?
有一段时间我对数学课不太喜欢，上课精力不集中。现在虽然有点儿进步，但对新知识仍不能熟练掌握，考试时不能举一反三;在家里预习不能很好坚持，练习也不多，爸爸也不主张打题海战，可我总觉得各类题目做的不多、眼界不宽。
第三个问号是，为什么英语不能经常考一百分?
其实我对英语是比较喜欢的，有时也能考一百分，就是不经常。爸爸也帮助我分析过，主要是基本功不扎实，单词记的快也忘的快，没有做到温故知新;另一方面，听的少、写的少、说的更少。
三个问号使我想起了医生给病人看病，治病前，先要作出准确的诊断，才能拿出治疗方案。刚才谈到的三个问号也就自然引发出了三个感叹号，其实是我针对三门课的学习方案和考出好成绩的决心。
学好语文必须提前一步!老师要求预习，做到全面掌握;老师要求熟读，做到开始背诵;老师要求背诵，做到已经能够熟背。总之，严格要求，提前一步。
学好数学必须举一反三!紧紧抓住课堂45分钟，听进去，真正理解，概念清晰;多练习，会运用，真正掌握，能够举一反三。
学好英语必须多记多用!单词积累很重要，坚持每天背上几个单词，日积月累，词汇就丰富了;多听读、多运用，坚持每天晨读，有时间多与喜欢英语的同学交流，养成英语对话习惯，英语考试满分不是梦。
这是我对于自己成绩的反思，也是从三个问号变成三个感叹号的过程。我希望通过这样的反思可以让我的学习成绩有所提高。
⑥ 英语作文对话关于采访
(Q: question 问题） （A: answer 答案）Q:How are you doing, Jackie Chan!A:Q:How do you become a famous movie star?A:Q:What's your favorite kinds of movie?A:Q: Are you going to make more movies?A:Q: Can you talk abou how you develope your movie skills?A:按这个形式,你可以加多几个问题,A那里是成龙的回回答~希望对你答有帮助~!
⑦ 关于上学的英语作文对话
k:
who
is
this
？
凯西:这是谁?
l:this
is
liuhong.
may
i
speak
to
mr
k
?
李:这是liuhong。我可以和k先生说话吗?
k:speaking.
凯西:说话。
l:i
hope
i
donot
disturb
you.
we
are
very
glad
to
invite
you
to
partipate
in
our
english
discusting
in
our
school
on
friday
moring
.
are
you
available
?
我希望我不要打扰你。我们很高兴邀请你参加在周五早上我们学校不我们的英语恶心。你可用吗?
k:sorry.
i
canot
hear
you
clearly
？
pardon
？
凯西:对不起。我不能听清楚你?再说一遍?
l:
ok.
i
say
i
invite
you
to
go
our
school
for
english
discussion
on
friday
moring
。
l:好吧。我说我邀请你去我们学校周五早上英语讨论。
k:
oh.
that
is
fine.
i
will
be
on
time
.
凯西:哦。这是很好。我将准时。
l:
thank
you.
see
you
friday.
李:谢谢你。星期五见。
k:see
you
.
凯西:见到你。
⑧ 英语作文2篇信3篇对话
大街上每一家商店里的营业员和老板都在辛勤地工作，他们都热情地对待顾客，从不对顾客们翻白眼、说脏话。不管是什么节假日，这些商店里的营业员和老板从不休息。他们不仅仅是为了赚钱，还为了使我们得到更好的服务。
不仅各个商店、超市里的营业员在国庆节辛勤地工作，在大街上还有一群不知劳累的工作者——环卫工人。环卫工人每天都起早贪黑地劳动，就算在国庆节也从不休息。环卫工人每天都在为我们的城市做出贡献。大家试想一下，如果没有环卫工人，我们的生活会怎么样：到处是垃圾，臭气难闻……我们一天也离不开他们，而他们每天都在工作，都在环保，都在劳累。他们为了什么?还不是为了让我们有一个清洁的生活环境，让我们能过一个舒适的国庆。
⑨ 英语作文关于科目的对话
Maybe someday I will become a rich man.I will own a lot of wealth then I will do something I espect to do for a long time.First at all I will donate some money to poor family that let the child can go to school to learn,the old people can enjoy their life.Secondly,I will spend some money to make my parent life better.the last but not least is do some investment to contribute to our country's economics.
⑩ 简单英语对话作文带翻译
The National Day is coming!
国庆节就要到啦！
Jane：Yeah, we'll have a vacation for seven days. What do you plan on doing ring the holiday?
是啊，我们可以过个七天长假了。放假你都打算干吗啊？
Ben：I plan on going sightseeing.
我想去旅游。
Jane：Oh, Gosh! There will be so many tourists ring that time. Why don't you change your plans?
天啊，这个时候旅游景点的人肯定特多。干吗不换个时间去？
Ben：I know, but it's not that easy for me to have such a long holiday to travel. What about your plans?
这个我也知道，可是难得有个这么长的假期可以去旅游啊。你打算做什么呢？
Jane：Me? I intend to stay at home for the whole seven days and have a good rest.
我啊？就打算在家待七天，好好儿休息休息。