1. 大学英语作文 joing society
My ideal society in my mind would be like this: To start with, everyone should be treated on an equal basis. Surely, there is a saying like "everyone was born equally." In that case, citizens can lead a delighting life rather than a miserable one, which may markedly curtail the incidence of criminal acts. In the second place, indivials would not have hard time landing their occupations. By that I mean, their concerns about daily necessities would be less, which could maitain the societal stability. Finally, the society that I yearn for would be no environmental contaminations. In other words, the citizenry would not have to be confronted with environmental issues which may render us plagued with some persistent diseases such as respiratory diseases.
2. 全国创新英语作文大赛全国一等奖能参加什么高校的自主招生
2017年自主招生抄认可的各类竞赛奖项挺多的，不过各个高校要求也会稍有不同。一般像数学奥林匹克CMO、新概念作文大赛等省级以上的竞赛都是可以的。自主招生考试的难度比高考要简单得多，你可以找网上一些免费的自主招生模拟题参考一下哦~~
3. 大学生D类竞赛英语作文例文
大学生英语竞赛内D类资料容 http://ishare.iask.sina.com.cn/search.php?key=%D3%A2%D3%EF%BE%BA%C8%FCD%C0%E0&format= http://ishare.iask.sina.com.cn/search.php?key=%D3%A2%D3%EF%BE%BA%C8%FCD%BC%B6&format=
4. 大学英语作文，主题如下，急求大神学霸帮忙！！！词数100～150 1. 目前高校排名相当盛
Dear Mr.Fallows:
I appreciate that,as the new editor of U.S.News & World Report,you have much to do at this moment.However,it is precisely because you are the new editor that I write to you,personally.
I emphasize you,because of your demonstrated willingness to examine journalism in the same way that journalism examines all other facets of society.And I say personally because my letter is for your consideration,and not a letter to the editor for publication.
My timing also is related to the recent appearance of the annual U.S.News "America's Best Colleges" rankings.As the president of a university that is among the top-ranked universities,I hope I have the standing to persuade you that much about these rankings - particularly their specious formulas and spurious precision - is utterly misleading.I wish I could forego this letter since,after all,the rankings are only another newspaper story.Alas,alumni,foreign newspapers,and many others do not bring a sense of perspective to the matter.
I am extremely skeptical that the quality of a university - any more than the quality of a magazine - can be measured statistically.However,even if it can,the procers of the U.S.News rankings remain far from discovering the method.Let me offer as prima facie evidence two great public universities:the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor and the University of California-Berkeley.These clearly are among the very best universities in America - one could make a strong argument for either in the top half-dozen.Yet,in the last three years,the U.S.News formula has assigned them ranks that lead many readers to infer that they are second rate:Michigan 21-24-24,and Berkeley 23-26-27.
Such movement itself - while perhaps good for generating attention and sales - corrodes the credibility of these rankings and your magazine itself.Universities change very slowly - in many ways more slowly than even I would like.Yet,the people behind the U.S.News rankings lead readers to believe either that university quality pops up and down like politicians in polls,or that last year's rankings were wrong but this year's are right (until,of course,next year's prove them wrong).What else is one to make of Harvard's being #1 one year and #3 the next,or Northwestern's leaping in a single bound from #13 to #9?And it is not just this year.Could Johns Hopkins be the 22nd best national university two years ago,the 10th best last year,and the 15th best this year?Which is correct,that Columbia is #9 (two years ago),#15 (last year) or #11 (this year)?
Knowing that universities - and,in most cases,the statistics they submit - change little from one year to the next,I can only conclude that what are changing are the formulas the magazine's number massagers employ.And,indeed,there is marked evidence of that this year.
In the category "Faculty resources," even though few of us had significant changes in our faculty or student numbers,our class sizes,or our finances,the rankings' procers created a mad scramble in rank order,for example:
Down Last year This year Up Last year This year
Harvard #1 #11 MIT #6 #2
Stanford 3 15 Duke 13 4
Brown 12 22 Yale 10 6
Johns Hopkins 15 19
Dartmouth 18 24
One component of this category,"Student/faculty ratio," changed equally sharply,and not just in rank order but in what the magazine has presented as absolute numbers.Again,this is with very little change in our student or faculty counts:
Worse Last year This year Better Last year This year
Johns Hopkins 7/1 14/1 Chicago 13/1 7/1
Harvard 11/1 12/1 Penn 11/1 6/1
Stanford 12/1 13/1 Yale 11/1 9/1
Duke 12/1 14/1
Then there is "Financial resources," where Stanford dropped from #6 to #9,Harvard from #5 to #7.Our resources did not fall; did other institutions' rise so sharply?
I infer that,in each case,the formulas were simply changed,with notification to no one,not even your readers,who are left to assume that some schools have suddenly soared,others precipitously plummeted.
One place where a change was made openly was,perhaps,the most openly absurd.This is the new category "Value added." I quote the magazine:
Researchers have long sought ways to measure the ecational value added by indivial colleges.We believe that we have created such an indicator.Developed in consultation with academic experts,it focuses on the difference between a school's predicted graation rate - based upon the median or average SAT or ACT scores of its students and its ecational expenditures per student - and its actual graation rate.
This passage is correct that such a measure has long been sought.However,like the Holy Grail,no one has found it,certainly not the "we" of this passage.The method employed here is,indeed,the apotheosis of the errors of the creators of these ratings:valid questions are answered with invalid formulas and numbers.
Let me examine an example in "Value added":The California Institute of Technology offers a rigorous and demanding curriculum that undeniably adds great value to its students.Yet,Caltech is crucified for having a "predicted" graation rate of 99% and an actual graation rate of 85%.Did it ever occur to the people who created this "measure" that many students do not graate from Caltech precisely because they find Caltech too rigorous and demanding - that is,adding too much value - for them?Caltech could easily meet the "predicted" graation rate of 99% by offering a cream-puff curriculum and automatic A's.Would that be adding value?How can the people who came up with this formula defend graation rate as a measure of value added?And even if they could,precisely how do they manage to combine test scores and "ecation expenditures" - itself a suspect statistic - to predict a graation rate?
Were U.S.News,under your leadership,to walk away from these misleading rankings,it would be a powerful display of common sense.I fear,however,that these rankings and their byprocts have become too attention-catching for that to happen.
Could there not,though,at least be a move toward greater honesty with,and service to,your readers by moving away from the false precision?Could you not do away with rank ordering and overall scores,thus admitting that the method is not nearly that precise and that the difference between #1 and #2 - indeed,between #1 and #10 - may be statistically insignificant?Could you not,instead of tinkering to "perfect" the weightings and formulas,question the basic premise?Could you not admit that quality may not be truly quantifiable,and that some of the data you use are not even truly available (e.g.,many high schools do not report whether their graates are in the top 10% of their class)?
Parents are confused and looking for guidance on the best choice for their particular child and the best investment of their hard-earned money.Your demonstrated record gives me hope that you can begin to lead the way away from football-ranking mentality and toward helping to inform,rather than mislead,your readers.
5. 马上要参加一个大学英语作文大赛，可不可以推荐几本书籍能提升英语写
《How to Write Short: Word Craft for Fast Times》
《The Process of Composition》
《写作的回过程》
《On Writing Well》
《格答调的元素》
6. 大学英语作文翻译
An increasing number of college students are becoming bloggers． to note down what happens to them,to describe their emothions and feelings,also to espress opinions on current affairs.
People‘s views on this phenomenon vary from person to person.Some hold that it is good idea for students to keep a blog,as it not only provide an outlet(途径)for the students to express their inner feelings like traditional diaries,but also provide a channel through which students can communicate with others.However,Others have different opinions ,They point out that writing blog takes college students too much time which should be spend on their courses,and Some bloggers’ writing just for clicks and grade.
Personally,as one coin has two sides ,boths views stated above are resonable,In my opinion what should we do is that we need be aware of its potential shortcomings and make full use of its advantages.
7. 【急】求两篇大学英语作文(大一水平) 满意会补分
It Pays to Be Honest
We have to admit that there are more and more cheating cases in society nowadays.Merchants release various fake commercials on TV and radio.Bad men cheat the elderly on the road and street.Students cheat in exams for high grades.Swindlers trick into people through the phone and the Internet.These cases come out around us every day.And all these suggest social dishonesty,which has become a big problem and a public hazard.
Dishonesty is against the development of society.It will damage the normal relationship of people.As we know,honesty is the basic of the relationship between people.Without honesty,there will be no belief or cooperation,and the whole society will sink into the mutual deception.What a horrible thing!
In fact,honesty is originally a good quality of human being.It is honesty that has led us to a world with civilization,modernization and friendship.It pays to be honesty! And our society calls for honesty.Dear friends,let's be honest and say,"Dishonesty,no way!"
先写1篇，满意追加悬赏后，再写另一篇。
8. 英文简历 honors里面要写 全国大学生数学竞赛上海赛区三等奖
The 3rd Prize of national mathematic contest in Shanghai for undergraate students
9. 谁能给我写一篇150词左右的大学英语作文，是关于课外活动的重要性的，分三段写
Importance of Extracurricular Activity
It's very important for we students to participate actively in after class activities. Every student should engage in some after class activities because we can learn many valuable things that we won’t learn in classrooms from those after class activities . First of all , after class activities are an integral part of school life. By going in for such activities, we can learn what we can’t learn from books, which will be beneficial to us in the future. Secondly,from some after class activities we can develop the friendship with the classmates and learn to cooperate with others. Last but not the least,after class activities can broaden our circle of acquaintances.
I think ,the best extracurricular activity shoud not only be interesting for us ,but also can be good for our health and developing the mental .We should expand our interests through taking some meaningful activities and sports may be fine.Suppose we were girls,taking some gymnastics is good for us keeping slim.At the meantime,if we were boys,playing baksetball or football is also available for us.
As far as I can see, school is not just a place for learning the difference between "lie" or "lay", or what caused the hours of the daily schele. No amount of ordinary school work can take the place of friends acquired in the informal familiarities of activities.