㈠ sat作文題目有哪幾種類型
本來的話是議論文和記敘文都可以
但是江奇有說中國人的思維不緊密，寫議論文會得內低容分，所以最好寫記敘文（要有大量的細節~細節才是王道！）
一般記敘文分6塊內容：
勇氣。失敗是成功之母（個人，名人篇都要。）。自我滿足感。創新。科技進步（科技好和不好的影響）。說真話說假話
㈡ SAT作文題目的各種問法，急
SAT作文的分類,所有真題
Indiviality
--Following the Crowd
Do people need to compare themselves with others in order to appreciate what they have?
Are widely held views often wrong, or are such views more likely to be correct?
Is there any value for people to belong only to a group or groups with which they have something in common?
Is it always best to determine one's own views of right and wrong, or can we benefit from following the crowd?
Is it more valuable for people to fit in than to be unique and different?
Are people more likely to be proctive and successful when they ignore the opinions of others?
--Following Authority
Should we pay more attention to people who are older and more experienced than we are?
Should society limit people's exposure to some kinds of information or forms of expression?
Can a group of people function effectively without someone being in charge?
Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions of authority?
Should society limit people's exposure to some kinds of information or forms of expression?
Is ecation primarily the result of influences other than school?
Should schools help students understand moral choices and social issues?
--Following Creativity
Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others?
Is it better for a society when people act as indivials rather than ing the ideas and opinions of others?
Is creativity needed more than ever in the world today?
Can people ever be truly original?
Do we put too much value on the ideas or actions of indivial people?
Does planning interfere with creativity?
Motivation and Success
--Hardship and Success
Do people truly benefit from hardship and misfortune?
Do we really benefit from every event or experience in some way?
Do people place too much emphasis on winning?
Do people learn more from losing than from winning?
Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?
Does being ethical make it hard to be successful?
Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?
Is persistence more important than ability in determining a person's success?
Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is not reached?
--Self-Determination and Success
Is identity something people are born with or given, or is it something people create for themselves?
Is it best for people to accept who they are and what they have, or should people always strive to better themselves?
Do success and happiness depend on the choices people make rather than on factors beyond their control?
Are people more likely to be happy if they focus on goals other than their own happiness?
Is it more important to do work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?
--Self-Expectation and Success
Do highly accomplished people achieve more than others mainly because they expect more of themselves?
Can people achieve success only if they aim to be perfect?
Is it best to have low expectations and to set goals we are sure of achieving?
--Collaboration and Success
Is it necessary for people to combine their efforts with those of others in order to be most effective?
Are organizations or groups most successful when their members pursue indivial wishes and goals?
Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?
--Ethics and Success
Does fame bring happiness, or are people who are not famous more likely to be happy?
Are people's actions motivated primarily by a desire for power over others?
--Quality or Quantity and Success
Do people achieve greatness only by finding out what they are especially good at and developing that attribute above all else?
Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?
Technological 「Progress」
Does a strong commitment to technological progress cause a society to neglect other values, such as ecation and the protection of the environment?
Are there benefits to be gained from avoiding the use of modern technology, even when using it would make life easier?
Has today's abundance of information only made it more difficult for us to understand the world around us?
Is the most important purpose of technology today different from what it was in the past?
Have modern advancements truly improved the quality of people's lives?
Do newspapers, magazines, television, radio, movies, the Internet, and other media determine what is important to most people?
Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?
Heroes
Do we benefit from learning about the flaws of people we admire and respect?
Should we limit our use of the term "courage" to acts in which people risk their own well-being for the sake of others or to uphold a value?
Should we admire heroes but not celebrities?
Is there a value in celebrating certain indivials as heroes?
Tradition
Do all established traditions deserve to remain in existence?
Do people need to "unlearn," or reject, many of their assumptions and ideas?
Should people always prefer new things, ideas, or values to those of the past?
Do incidents from the past continue to influence the present?
Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past and succeed in the present?
Is it always necessary to find new solutions to problems?
Loyalty
Should people always be loyal?
Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?
Can deception—pretending that something is true when it is not—sometimes have good results?
Is it sometimes necessary to be impolite?
Is acting an essential part of everyday life?
Others (less clearly defined; separated by spaces)
Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?
Should people choose one of two opposing sides of an issue, or is the truth usually found "in the middle"?
Is the main value of the arts to teach us about the world around us?
Can books and stories about characters and events that are not real teach us anything useful?
Can common sense be trusted and accepted, or should it be questioned?
Do people put too much emphasis on learning practical skills?
Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect their communities or the nation in general?
Should people let their feelings guide them when they make important decisions?
Can people have too much enthusiasm?
Do images and impressions have too much of an effect on people?
Are decisions made quickly just as good as decisions made slowly and carefully?
Should people change their decisions when circumstances change, or is it best for them to stick with their original decisions?
Is it better to change one's attitude than to change one's circumstances?
Is criticism—judging or finding fault with the ideas and actions of others—essential for personal well-being and social progress?
Does having a large number of options to choose from make people happy?
我還有我自己分的,如果你要的話用網路Hi我~O(∩_∩)O~
㈢ 誰有2016一月sat的考後回憶解析啊亞洲區香港的，作文是change people or ch
我們常說失敗了並沒有什麼，只是看你如何去對待。這次的失敗並不代表什麼，只因我們還更需要進步！更需要拼搏。這好像是在為自己找借口，可轉念，一切不也就是如此嗎？心態好的人會以此未動力，而心態差的人卻把此當之為阻力。一次次的失敗，一次次的掙扎，一次次的不服輸，一次次的不屈不撓。
失敗像深秋里帶有寒意的風。雖然不如春分和煦，不如夏風炙熱，卻能把果實吹紅。失敗像磨石，雖然能夠吧認得靈魂磨痛，甚至要滴血，卻會讓人豐富自己的生命。就算失敗有如何，我們不會因此而低頭，不會彎下我們高貴的身脊，不會無價值的折磨自己、用眼淚侵泡嘆息。我們會重新選擇走向成功的開始。
也許上次考試時，事情並不是朝著我期待的方向所發展的，我們會感到沮喪，但我們仍會有信心，努力前進。事情就是這樣，有時候我們想的多說的多，理論上一套一套的，卻忘記最終的行動只有一套，言論的花開的愈大，行為的果結的愈小。只有小心眼的人才會說別人小心眼，但成功的人一定不會說自己有多麼的成功！
我相信一千個零比不上一個一，一萬次承諾比不上一次付出，壹佰萬句空話比不上一句實踐，一千萬次徘徊比不上一次放飛。我們不會因為某一次的努力曾經失敗而放棄所有的努力。
要想證明自己，就要努力讓自己做出成績，就像長在山谷里的野百合，在它還沒有盛開的時候，別人把它當成雜草，但一旦她努力的開放後，它那一塵不染的潔白在一堆雜草中是那麼的耀眼。也許現在的我只是一株默默無聞的雜草，但終究有一天，我們會努力讓自己成為那株盛開的百合!!!
㈣ 1月28日sat作文題目是什麼
Should we treat people according to what they have done or what they are capable of doing?
具體的題目記不起來了
大體意思是「我們該如何衡量一個人，是通過他專已經取得的成就？還是他有屬能力做的事情？」
不難，同學一般都寫what they have done吧，這樣比較好舉例子
㈤ 急，2010年1月23日考完SAT考生請告知作文題目，不勝感激！
額..翻譯過來大概是....
是不是explore unfamiliar的東東比familiar的更能有great descovery...大概是這樣
㈥ SAT作文題目可以分成哪幾個類別
改革後的SAT作文依然會由兩位閱卷人評判。每位閱卷人將以1-4分來分別評閱考生作文中的閱讀回、分析答和寫作三個維度。新SAT改革之後，同學們就要用新的眼光去對待了，下面小編就整理了新SAT作文幾分算高分的相關介紹。
新SAT的寫作將從三個方面進行評分：Reading(閱讀)，Analysis(分析)，Writing(寫作)。每個分數都是由2位專業的評卷老師完成，每位老師給出的分數范圍為1-4分，所以最終結合兩位閱卷者老師的分數後，考生每個方面的分數范圍為2-8分。和以往的寫作考試不同，這三個分數彼此並不會疊加，也不會與其他單項合並計算，也就是說，滿分的文章分數為8/8/8(三個分數分別對應Reading，Analysis，Writing)。
㈦ 針對sat1 1月寫作考題的
首先第一二句沒有 所以 這種邏輯啊...
完全不能推導出來.
第三句 看了半天 太 chiEng了吧 From...to 通常是內時間上的變化容.
從第三句看出 你想說的人要經過磨練,逆境才能成功. 然後第四句就說 我們要從他們的past feats里估量他們的價值?邏輯非常混雜. SAT注意的是邏輯..
如果要我幫你修改下,我可以想想
㈧ 這次12月的SAT作文題目是什麼請考完馬上回答~~
剛剛天水圍考完哈。
今年的題目是問你do
people
help
others
for
something
paid
back
in
some
ways.大概是這意思，就是說人幫助其他人是內不是為了變相的容索取。
之前有過類似題目，不難。