⑴ 克隆的利與弊英語作文
My View on Clone
With the repid development of technology, clone comes to the world. It can plicate creature, which means it can make contribution to the proction. People can pay a little and get a lot in the end. However, it also has disavantages. I think as the development of the high-tech, people can use clone to humen beings. It』s so horrible for me to know that there is someone the same with me. But in general, clone has more advantages than disadvantages.
⑵ 克隆的好處英文版
克隆是抄英文"clone"或"cloning"的音譯，而英文"clone"則起源於希臘文"Klone"，原意是指以幼苗或嫩枝插條，以無性繁殖或營養繁殖的方式培育植物，如扦插和嫁接。在大陸譯為「無性繁殖」，在台灣與港澳一般意譯為復制或轉殖或群殖。 中文也有更加確切的詞表達克隆，「無性繁殖」、「無性系化」以及「純系化」。克隆是指生物體通過體細胞進行的無性繁殖，以及由無性繁殖形成的基因型完全相同的後代個體組成的種群。通常是利用生物技術由無性生殖產生與原個體有完全相同基因的個體或種群。
克隆也可以理解為復制、拷貝和翻倍（港澳台的意譯），就是從原型中產生出同樣的復製品，它的外表及遺傳基因與原型完全相同，但大多行為 思想不同。時至今日，「克隆」的含義已不僅僅是「無性繁殖」，凡是來自同一個祖先，無性繁殖出的一群個體，也叫「克隆」。這種來自同一個祖先的無性繁殖的後代群體也叫「無性繁殖系」，簡稱無性系。簡單講就是一種人工誘導的無性繁殖方式。但克隆與無性繁殖是不同的。克隆是指人工操作動物繁殖的過程，無性繁殖是指：不經過兩性生殖細胞的結合由母體直接產生新個體的生殖方式，常見的有孢子生殖、被子生殖出芽生殖和分裂生殖。
⑶ 求克隆的好處與壞處（英文）
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
But cloning still has some problems. The scientists found that the cloning animal』 Gene has a little different from the original animal. So the life will shorter than the real life. The fact proved that, the cloning sheep Dolly has died. It only has the half life of the common sheep.
⑷ 克隆的好處和壞處 英文
The advantages and disadvantages of cloning
⑸ 用英文描述克隆技術的好處
The Problems of Cloning
Since March 1997, the birth of a cloned sheep, named Dolly, has caused a great sensation around the world. Though it was not the first time that the experiment using cloning succeeded, the reason why Dolly shocked the world was that she was the first clone from a cell of an alt mammal, something previously thought to be impossible. This meant that the possibility of cloning human beings was increased. For fear of realizing human cloning, a lot of countries have taken necessary measures to regulate the study of it. Some people, such as scientists in this field and certain infertile couples, are now arguing against banning it. But I think we should ban human cloning because it has a possibility to rece the value of our life, to take away indiviality in our society, and to destroy the moral and social systems human have long cultivated.
Richard Seed, a physicist who supports human cloning, said in a radio interview that he would open a clinic of human cloning for infertile people and make a big profit (Hotwired Japan). If human cloning is allowed, there would be so many people such as Seed, who use cloning technology to make money. The business operating the technology looks so profitable because according to a report, there could be 100,000 or so women in the U.S. who would like a similar chance to use cloning to have their own babies (Watson). Probably, they do not care how much money they pay to have their own blood-related babies. To allow human cloning creates a world where we could get life with money. Buying life rece the value of it because we cannot respect things which we can get easily. It could lead to the increase of murder. And it would be possible that someday at a department store we can buy life that is labeled, "ON SALE!"
There are many people in the world who do anything for the sake of money. As a result, cloning technology is in danger of being abused. First, I think I should explain how to clone humans. In the simplest language, cloning is the process in which the DNA from some cell of a body is put by electrical shock into a female egg cell whose DNA has been removed. Then the egg cell is implanted into a womb, and after that it grows as same as a natural baby does. The problem is that there is absolutely no reason why the egg cell need be implanted into the same woman who offers DNA. Hence it might be connected with abuses, such as a black market of egg cells or a black company offering surrogate mothers. Watson pointed out that because many women suffer from anatomical complications which prohibit successful childbearing, they might try to find a suitable surrogate mother. And he also insists that women who just do not like the discomforts of pregnancy might use cloning technology. In this point, human cloning is no longer developed for only infertile people but also for lazy women.
As I explained in the previous paragraph, cloning needs the DNA of only one person. Dr. Ian Wilmut in Roslin Institute, where Dolly was proced, claims that we should use the word, "ing," for reproction of a human instead of "cloning" (Otsuka 1). He has investigated cloning technology in order to proce milk which contains a human protein for premature babies, not to clone humans (Begley 47). Human cloning would create plication of humans, and the indiviality of each human would be lost. Someone may oppose the idea saying that the environment in which a person grow largely contributes the formation of his personality, however, his appearance would be completely the same as the original. Someone may contend that twins have the same appearance and are accepted. However, making twins restricts the indiviality artificially, not naturally. Natural and artificial are very different. We should separate them.
I doubt whether a human conceived by cloning will be treated as same as the others. In a present school situation where bullying is an everyday occurrence, the fact of being a clone may be a factor of being bullied. And it is possible that a cloned human would be dependent and inferior existence to the original. We would most likely think a clone is kind of a of the original rather than a kind of twin because of the disparity in age. Thus human cloning is an invasion of privacy for the human conceived by cloning. We should consider human cloning in that light. We do not have a right to take away the originality of any human - even a clone.
Of course, there are advantages to develop cloning technology. Ian Wilmut demands that the study of it not to be banned, emphasizing that the technology would be useful for the development of treatment for genetic diseases and of mass proction of good cattle which will be surely needed in the future when population is larger than today (Otsuka 1). Meanwhile, he opposes human cloning for moral reasons. Human cloning will make family system even worse than it is at the present. Because cloning needs only one DNA, and it does not matter whether a man or a woman offers it, we can easily imagine that there will be much more single-parent families. If a man wants to have a baby by himself, he can have one, offering his DNA to a surrogate mother. In other words, children conceived by cloning cannot have both blood-related father and mother. Even if it is okay for a parent, it is very hard for the child. We may anticipate that juvenile delinquents would increase at higher rate than now.
Some religions would be badly damaged for the reason that the belief that God give a birth to human would be destroyed. Mark D. Eibert, an attorney at law, argues that religious thinking should not be an excuse of banning things since all people in a country do not believe one specific religion. I agree with this point; however, we should not ignore religions completely. In fact there are some countries where one religion play an important role. Likewise, I suppose that human cloning would create a society where science technology controls everything even our birth. According to Watson, cloning technology might allow us to choose which baby we have, a boy or a girl. The technology will influence so many things in so many fields.
By permitting cloning of human, too many problems would occur. I can understand that the research of human cloning will help infertility. But I attach more importance to the value of our lives, indiviality, and bond of a family than curing minor number of people. Eibert strongly insists that the government should not make cloning of human illegal. He claimed that everyone has the right to have his baby and it is a freedom which the government cannot infringe. I opposed this opinion and the government should intervene in this kind of dispute. I wonder who else except the government can make the scientists think calmly and tell them to stop improving the technology that has a possibility of breaking rules in our society. I insist that cloning of human should not be done.
⑹ 克隆好處英文版
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
Of course, there still remains much more disadvantages of the application of cloning reproction of human being and animals. We should be extremely cautious of what we do and thus remember we will sure be respondible for all the results created
⑺ 急需一篇關於『克隆人對我們的好處「的英語作文，大約在120到150字左右的。要倆篇，謝謝
Clone to our advantage
On medicine has the advantage, although there are a lot of disadvantages clone but it can also make many infertile men completed dream
Now the cloning scientific divided into therapeutic cloning sexual and reproctive cloning two kinds. The former is the use of embryonic stem cells cloned human organs, for medical research, to solve the organ transplant donor shortage problem, this is the international scientific community and ethical within both support, but there is a premise, is used for therapeutic cloning embryos cannot exceed 14 days of pregnancy the boundaries. For reproctive cloning sex, what say normally namely clone, e to its overall violated the life of ethical principles, so, scientists mainstream consensus is firmly opposed. UNESCO, the world health organization and the international human genome ethics committees and governments are also very clear that oppose reproctive sex cloning
Modern science and technology is a double-edged sword, in its benefit mankind can also bring some negative effects. This is kindled against us raises a question: modern technology, especially the modern life science and technology, don't respect ethical principle, will not listen to the voice of ethics? Professor shen pointed out: now some scientists propose, as long as science might do, you should do it. In fact, this is mistaken. If technology, we can proce a kind of serious harm to humans super life, difficult way can also go to manufacture? Some scientific lunatic is under the banner of "scientific freedom", to do some harm to humans. Therefore, we should guard modern science and technology by some ax-grinders utilization. In addition, nor make scientific freedom and ethical contradiction. The modern life science development suggests, ethical standard and guide, and no beam, listen to the voice of ethics, concive to scientific more healthy, smooth development
1．會使地球人數增多
2．在醫學上有好處,克隆人雖然有很多壞處但它也可以使許多沒有生育能力的人完成夢想
3．現在科學界把克隆分為治療性克隆和生殖性克隆兩種。前者是利用胚胎幹細胞克隆人體器官，供醫學研究、解決器官移植供體不足問題，這是國際科學界和倫理學界都支持的，但有一個前提，就是用於治療性克隆的胚胎不能超出妊娠14天這一界限。而對於生殖性克隆，即通常所說的克隆人，由於它在總體上違背了生命倫理原則，所以，科學家的主流意見是堅決反對的。聯合國教科文組織、世界衛生組織和國際人類基因組倫理委員會和各國政府也都非常明確地表示，反對生殖性克隆
4．現代科學技術是一把雙刃劍，在其造福人類的同時也會帶來一些負面效應。這就向我們提出了一個問題：現代科技，特別是現代生命科技，要不要尊重倫理學原則，要不要傾聽倫理的聲音？沈教授指出：現在有些科學家提出，只要科學上有可能做到的，就應該去做。事實上，這是錯誤的觀點。如果技術上我們能製造出一種嚴重危害人類的超級生命，難道也可以去製造嗎？一些科學狂人正是打著「科學自由」的旗號，去做一些危害人類的事。因此，我們要警惕現代科學技術被一些別有用心的人利用。另外，也不能把科學自由和倫理道德對立起來。現代生命科學發展的事實表明，倫理的規范和引導，並沒有束，傾聽倫理的聲音，有利於科學更健康、順利地發展
⑻ 克隆的好處英文
可以使一些瀕臨滅絕的動物得以種族延續，並在醫學上有好處，克隆人雖然有很多壞處但它也可以使許多沒有生育能力的人完成夢想現在科學界把克隆分為治療性克隆和生殖性克隆兩種。前者是利用胚胎幹細胞克隆人體器官，供醫學研究、解決器官移植供體不足問題，這是國際科學界和倫理學界都支持的，但有一個前提，就是用於治療性克隆的胚胎不能超出妊娠14天這一界限。而對於生殖性克隆，即通常所說的克隆人，由於它在總體上違背了生命倫理原則，所以，科學家的主流意見是堅決反對的。聯合國教科文組織、世界衛生組織和國際人類基因組倫理委員會和各國政府也都非常明確地表示，反對生殖性克隆。 Can make some of the endangered animals continue to race, and medical benefits of human cloning, in spite of many disadvantages, but it can also make many people unable to have children now dream of the completion of the scientific community to be divided into therapeutic cloning and reproctive cloning Two types of cloning. The former is the use of embryonic stem cell cloning of human organs for medical research to address the shortage of donor organ transplants, which is the international scientific community and the ethics community support, but there is a premise that is used for therapeutic cloning of embryos pregnancy can not exceed 14 The limits of the day. As for reproctive cloning, known as human cloning, since it generally goes against the principles of bioethics, so the scientists, the mainstream opinion is strongly against it. UNESCO, the World Health Organization and the International Human Genome Ethics Commission and the governments are very clear that opposition to reproctive cloning.
⑼ 克隆的好處英語作文
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
Of course, there still remains much more disadvantages of the application of cloning reproction of human being and animals. We should be extremely cautious of what we do and thus remember we will sure be respondible for all the results created by ourselves!!!
So how do u think about it?
請採納
如果你認可我的回答，敬請及時採納，
~如果你認可我的回答，請及時點擊【採納為滿意回答】按鈕
~~手機提問的朋友在客戶端右上角評價點【滿意】即可。
~你的採納是我前進的動力
~~O(∩_∩)O，記得好評和採納，互相幫助
⑽ 關於英語作文克隆的好處與壞處100字
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
Of course, there still remains much more disadvantages of the application of cloning reproction of human being and animals. We should be extremely cautious of what we do and thus remember we will sure be respondible for all the results created by ourselves!!!