『壹』 核能的優點和缺點至少各 三方面
本人英語不好，樓主自己翻譯吧O(∩_∩)O~
優點：1.發電效率高。運行成本低，利潤高，經濟性好。一個核電廠一年只用幾噸材料即可，運輸方便。
2.能源儲備高。現已探明的鈾礦等，可供人類和平利用N多年。
3.環保性能好。只要核電安全運行，對環境保護是很有好處的。
缺點：1.建造成本高。雖然運行成本低利潤高，但是建造成本高。
2.安全要求高，如遇重大意外災害，可能會造成大規模影響，比如日本核電，因為地震而輻射。
3.對地質依賴高。選址很困難，要求地質情況好，少發地震，水文條件好，需要大量冷卻水。
『貳』 有關核電站利弊的英語作文
Nuclear power stations have been spread everywhere.But their safety has caused a heated discussion about their existance.
First,I think that nuclear power stations can provide more electricity than the traditional thermal power stations.They cost less non-renewable resources and proce more electricity.Second,they can push the development of science and technology.Because the nuclear power is a new technology,it can develop fast.Last but not least,nuclear power stations can decrease pollution.Because they rarely proce waste gas and water.
Nuclear power stations can benefit us more in the future if government can take safer measures to prevent from accidents.
翻譯：核電站在世界上分布很廣。但是它們的安全性引發了一場關於其是否應該存在激烈討論。
首先，我認為相比傳統熱電站，核電站可以提供更多的電能。它們消耗更少的不可再生資源，產出更多的電能。第二，它們可以推動科技的發展。因為核能是一項新技術，它可以發展很迅猛。最後，核電站可以減少污染。因為它們幾乎不排放廢水廢氣。
如果政府可以採取更安全的措施來防止事故的話，在不久的將來，核電站會讓我們受益匪淺。
絕對原創，望採納，謝謝！！
『叄』 以「核電的利弊」為題寫一篇英語作文
As we know, nuclear power station has been established in many conurbation. Some people insist that it is good, while others think should not do that. For me, I think we cannot live without nuclear plants. If natural resources run out, nuclear power station will be our two of the chosen not. Encounter difficulties we should not flinch, we want to continue to move forward, continue to improve the safety of nuclear power station system, better development.
『肆』 關於核能利用的英語作文
核能(Nuclear Energy)
Nowadays, energy can be obtained through various sources such as oil, coal, natural gas, solar heat, wind, etc. But the conventional energy like oil, coals are being used up rapidly, and solar heat can't become widely used immediately for technological reason. In my opinion, unclear energy will take the place of conventional energy, because people now can control this energy freely, and unclear energy is non-polluting, inexhaustible, and it's much safer than coal and oil. Coal and oil are burned, they also proce many harmful gases, and the air has been seriously polluted by such gases, which will threaten people's living environment. And many accident happened because of the wrong use of such energies.
However, such things can't happen when we use nuclear energy, Though when the nuclear leaks out, it will do great harm to people' s health and the environment. We can do enough work to avoid such things, and limited such things at a low percentage.
『伍』 有關核能利用的利與弊的英語作文 ps:寫的好額外送分
I dont agree to use newclear for power generation. Japan's newclear power leaking has approved the newclear is not a healthy power resource and there are lots of potential dangerous if we cannot use it properly. Other than that, there are lots of other samples to support my opinion. Therefore, we shall not build more newclear power station in the world.
我強烈反對利用核能，正面的東東看有米有人能提專供給屬你：-）
『陸』 英文 使用核能的益處與弊端
the pros and cons of using nuclear energy.
the benefits and harm of using nuclear energy.
『柒』 身旁有電腦的同志幫幫忙 搜一篇核能利與弊問題的英語作文 150詞 急！
Nowadays, energy can be obtained through various sources such as oil, coal, natural gas, solar heat, wind, etc. But the conventional energy like oil, coals are being used up rapidly, and solar heat can't become widely used immediately for technological reason. In my opinion, unclear energy will take the place of conventional energy, because people now can control this energy freely, and unclear energy is non-polluting, inexhaustible, and it's much safer than coal and oil. Coal and oil are burned, they also proce many harmful gases, and the air has been seriously polluted by such gases, which will threaten people's living environment. And many accident happened because of the wrong use of such energies.
However, such things can't happen when we use nuclear energy, Though when the nuclear leaks out, it will do great harm to people' s health and the environment. We can do enough work to avoid such things, and limited such things at a low percentage.
I believe if we use the nuclear energy in the right way, it will provide us enough energy without doing any harm to us.
『捌』 辯論稿 關於核能的壞處 英文的.!急.!
http://www.tribune.ie/article.tvt?_scope=Tribune/News/Comment&id=72481&SUBCAT=Tribune/News&SUBCATNAME=News
Nuclear a bad idea because it's stupid
The more time we waste debating nuclear, the less we'll have to make Ireland a real clean-energy state
BUILDING nuclear power stations in Ireland is not going to happen. But that won't stop some people from wanting to waste time and resources debating the issue.
So who benefits? The main boosters for nuclear are:
1) Amicus, an ESB trade union desperate to distract attention from the urgentlyneeded reforms that will see its power diminished; 2) the Chinese Communist Party;
3) professional media controversialists who wrongly see this as harmless fun; and 4) Dick Cheney. The more time we waste debating nuclear, the less time and resources we'll have to actually do the more profitable work of improving energy efficiency, deploying technologies we will actually use and making Ireland a world-class site for cleanenergy innovation.
I'm no sandal-wearing, muesli-eating crusty. I believe in free markets and profit-maximising capitalism. I don't give a fiddler's fart about some hippie morality agonising about nuclear technology.
I'm from the country that nuked Japan. Twice.
Nuclear isn't a bad idea because it's wrong. Nuclear is a bad idea because it's stupid. It's crap business and worse economics. As Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute puts it, "nuclear power died of an incurable attack of market forces." If only people would stop trying to revive the corpse.
If nuclear power is such a great deal, why is there not a single cent of private capital at risk in new nuclear building anywhere in the world?
Why, even after the US Congress in 2005 offered to spend $38bn to entirely subsidise the building of six new plants, did business credit rating agency Standard & Poor's leave its risk profile for nuclear precisely the same? S&P calls nuclear a "risky business practice" because most of the issues involved - like where to put the waste (under the Hill of Tara? ) and how to really account for the additional carbon footprint from mining, enrichment and construction - are further away than ever from being resolved.
"Why should we take the word of central planners in Beijing over capitalists in New York?" asks Lovins. "I don't get it. If you take markets seriously, you have to pay attention to market behaviour."
Nuclear advocates conjure up studies to make it seem economic, even arguing it's cheaper, which is breathtakingly dishonest. The cost of a delivered kilowatt hour from nuclear is actually up to twice as much as for wind. If you want to rece the perkilowatt cost for electricity and rece carbon emissions, nuclear compares very unfavourably to a combination of 'negawatts' - electricity never used because of conservation measures - and 'micropower'.
'Micropower' - instrial combined heat and power units plus small-scale renewables at your house - used to be considered fringe.
No longer. Micro-power in 2002 surpassed nuclear in worldwide installed capacity and today accounts for onesixth of all generation. And because the model is less instrial age and more like an energy internet, it is more reliable. Oh, and with no union jobs and almost entirely from private capital.
In fact, last year saw a record $100bn in investment in renewables, up from $80bn in 2005 - R&D for solar (where Silicon Valley sees a medium-term goldmine), wind turbine building, next-generation 'smart' electricity grids, biofuels.
If Ireland allows itself to get drawn into a pointless debate over the nuclear red herring, it will be our fault - because the Irish media will have given credibility to a topic that will get a lot of people quite upset, and thus more tuned in.
The future of your kids is worth more than protecting a handful of union jobs in outdated, centrally-planned electricity factories. Because we have shied away from this fight, keeping our energy future in the hands of some relic trade unionists, it's not going to be easy. It may already be too late to save jobs at multinationals which gave up waiting on us to get our energy act together. We may have to buy unions off with a fat pension pay-off along with their P45s. Every minute we waste on this nuclear red herring means that pay-off goes up. Amicus understands this. Do my misguided pro-business friends?
『玖』 求文檔: 核能利用的利與弊的英語作文
power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity.Some countries depend more on nuclear power for electricity than others. In France, for instance, about 75 percent of the electricity is generated from nuclear power. There are more than 400 nuclear power plants around the world.
To build a nuclear reactor (核反應堆),what you need is some mildly2 enriched uranium(鈾). Uranium is a fairly common element on Earth,incorporated3 into the planet ring the planet's formation(形成). U-235 is one of the few materials that can undergo4 inced fission(誘發性核裂變). Raising and lowering the control rods(桿，棒條) allow operators to control the rate of the nuclear reaction.When an operator (操作員) wants the uranium core to proce more heat,the rods are raised out of the uranium bundle(捆，束). To create less heat, the rods are lowered into the uranium bundle.The rods can also be lowered completely into the uranium bundle to shut the reactor down in the case of an accident or to change the fuel. The uranium bundleactsasanextremely high-energy source of heat. It heats the water and turns it to steam. The steam drives a steam turbine(汽輪機), which spins5 a generator(發電機) to proce power.
Well-constructed nuclear power plants have an important advantage when it comes to electrical power generation——they are extremely clean. Compared with a coalfired power plant, nuclear power plants are a dream come true from an environmental standpoint (立場，觀點). Unfortunately, there are significant problems with nuclear power plants. Mining and purifying(提純) uranium has not, historically, been a very clean process. Improperly func- tioning nuclear power plants can create big problems. The Chernobyl6 disaster is a good example.Spent fuel from nuclear power plants is toxic (有毒的) for centuries, and, as yet, there is no safe, permanent(永久的) storage facility for it.
『拾』 核能利弊英語作文
Nuclear Energy
Nowadays, energy can be obtained through various sources such as oil, coal, natural gas, solar heat, wind, etc. But the conventional energy like oil, coals are being used up rapidly, and solar heat can't become widely used immediately for technological reason. In my opinion, unclear energy will take the place of conventional energy, because people now can control this energy freely, and unclear energy is non-polluting, inexhaustible, and it's much safer than coal and oil. Coal and oil are burned, they also proce many harmful gases, and the air has been seriously polluted by such gases, which will threaten people's living environment. And many accident happened because of the wrong use of such energies.
However, such things can't happen when we use nuclear energy, Though when the nuclear leaks out, it will do great harm to people' s health and the environment. We can do enough work to avoid such things, and limited such things at a low percentage.
I believe if we use the nuclear energy in the right way, it will provide us enough energy without doing any harm to us.