㈠ 初二英語作文80詞 關於影評的 急急急！！
《刺殺希特勒》(Valkyrie：歷史) 2009 (115 min) 英文影評：
What becomes of a movie star when the career hits a hiccup and the lustre starts to fade? If the movie star is smart, they go back to basics, reconnecting with the fire of their formative years. What drove them back then? What first made them strive for greatness? "When I was a kid I always wanted to kill Hitler," Tom Cruise revealed recently. "I hated that guy and all he stood for."
Valkyrie, then, is not just the latest Tom Cruise action thriller. It is the fruition of a dream; a boyhood fantasy writ large; a Hollywood blockbuster that provides an opportunity that was denied him in life. Inevitably he bungles it.
Bryan Singer's picture casts Cruise as Claus von Stauffenberg, the Wehrmacht colonel who spearheaded the 20 July 1944 plot to save the fatherland. Wounded in battle and sporting a natty eye-patch, von Stauffenberg has grown sick of war. He wants to "show the world that not all Germans are like Hitler". He hates that guy and all he stands for.
The obvious sticking point here is that (spoiler!) von Stauffenberg did not actually kill Hitler. The plot failed and the conspirators were executed. Played as a tragedy, or a stark study of failed ambitions, this might not have been a problem. Except that Singer opts to frame Valkyrie as a high-concept wartime suspense thriller, inviting us to suspend our disbelief and go along for the ride.
The 1944 plot was at least fiendishly planned and generally well executed. Singer's, by contrast, seems flawed and foolhardy from the start.
But what of Singer's co-conspirator? Valkyrie paints von Stauffenberg as the archetypal "good German", a model of elegant disenchantment. And yet Cruise, for all his skills as a performer, does not do disenchantment. For all the anguished moments of doubt, the constant stares into the mirror, his von Stauffenberg is essentially Top Gun with an eye-patch.
The film's curious melange of dialects only underscores this quality. Von Stauffenberg's cohorts are played by British actors (Bill Nighy, Terence Stamp, Kenneth Branagh) who deliver their lines in English accents. The villainous Nazi is portrayed by German actor Thomas Kretschmann who speaks English in a German accent. And then - standing separate and apart - is Cruise himself, intoning his lines in pureblood American. He might as well have been dropped in from an Allied plane; a gung-ho Hollywood hero sent in to clean up a very European mess. He couldn't manage it as a kid, and he can't quite do it now. Hitler one; Tom Cruise nil.
對應中文翻譯：
什麼成為一個電影明星，當職業生涯擊呃逆和光澤開始褪色？如果是聰明的電影明星，他們回歸本源，重新與消防的形成時期。是什麼驅使他們回呢？第一次是什麼使他們爭取的偉大？ 「當我還是孩子的我一直想殺死希特勒， 」湯姆克魯斯近日透露。 「我討厭那個傢伙和他主張。 」
北歐女神，那麼，不僅是湯姆克魯斯的最新動作片。這是取得成果的一個夢，一個兒時的夢想令狀大;好萊塢大片，提供一個機會，這是剝奪他的生命。不可避免地，他bungles它。
布萊恩辛格的圖片蒙上克魯斯的克勞斯馮施陶芬貝格，在國防軍上校誰帶頭1944年7月20號陰謀拯救祖國。在戰斗中受傷，並身穿整潔眼補丁，馮施陶芬貝格增加患病的戰爭。他希望「向世界表明，並不是所有的德國人喜歡希特勒」 。他討厭那個傢伙和他主張。
最明顯的症結是， （擾流板！ ）馮施陶芬貝格實際上沒有殺死希特勒。陰謀失敗，陰謀被處決。打一場悲劇，或形成了鮮明的研究沒有野心，這可能不是一個問題。但辛格選擇框女神作為高概念戰時懸疑驚悚片，邀請我們停止我們的懷疑和湊湊熱鬧。
1944年陰謀至少極為普遍得到很好的規劃和執行。歌手的，相比之下，似乎有缺陷的和愚蠢的開始。
但是歌手的同謀？女神油漆馮施陶芬貝格作為典型的「德國好人」 ，一個優雅的模型覺醒。但克魯斯，他的所有技能，作為一個演員，不會覺醒。所有的痛苦的時刻，毫無疑問，不斷地凝視到鏡子，他的馮施陶芬貝格基本上是壯志凌雲的眼睛修補程序。
影片的好奇混雜的方言不僅強調了這一點質量。馮施陶芬貝格的同夥正在發揮英國演員（比爾奈伊，特倫郵票，肯尼斯布萊納）誰提供的線在英語口音。納粹的罪惡所描繪的是德國演員托馬斯克萊徹曼誰講英語的德國口音。然後-除了常設單獨-是克魯斯本人，他的線intoning美國在pureblood 。他可能也已下降盟軍飛機從一個長庚浩好萊塢英雄發出清理非常歐洲一團糟。他無法管理它作為一個孩子，他不能做到現在。希特勒之一;湯姆克魯斯為零。
㈡ 如何寫影評英語作文常用句型
But those who have never suffered impairment of sight or hearing seldom mak
㈢ 用英文寫一篇影評
i watched film which is 'kongfu panda' yesterday. this movie describe a story of panda. its so funny and cute, and i like panda so much , I have a target after watch the movie , wishing can work with panda in further ~
㈣ 關於影評的英語作文
How
are
less
than
expected,
such
a
strong
line-up,
and
finally
came
out
really
such
an
effect.
The
most
exciting
part
of
the
film,
should
be
regarded
as
the
"smiling
death"
event
inside,
three
died
the
way
ahead,
and
an
aircraft
killed,
a
diving,
one
is
dancing
in
heaven,
really,
because
we
know
that
Michael
Tse
period
of
the
past,
that
figure
one
out
awesomeness,
and
Lu
Mixue
that
period
called
the
best,
and
which
know
spurt
after
this
period,
the
film
is
like
the
surging
river,
wen勺熏辮吭墜咎濱汛膊陌t
out
of
control
of
the
mediocre.
【應該超了，自己挑點吧，不二神探的，抱歉回哈~望採納答】
㈤ 電影觀後感英語作文
先說主題思想，我懷疑導演本人是猶太人，或者他爺爺奶奶那輩被納粹禍害過
以牙還牙以血還血的思想絲毫不加掩飾就表現出來了——殺了納粹還不過癮，還要像印第安武士那樣把納粹頭皮割掉；用棒球棍把納粹人頭砍成一灘膿水；用沖鋒槍把納粹人頭打成一灘膿水；好容易留一個活口吧——還要在人家頭上用刀刻一個納粹標志，以示懲戒。
好暴力啊。。。。。我覺得導演其實是想說，戰爭的本質就是邪惡的，暴力就是邪惡的；戰爭中沒有正義與邪惡之分，或許只有惡大惡小之分。。。。（蘇珊娜最後出現在電影屏幕上的臉，大仇得報的滿足的表情——其實很像惡鬼）
關於人物——那個「猶太獵手」太有個性了，雖然變態，但很有人格魅力；還有那個小雞雞在酒館被打爛的那個蓋世太保軍官，也很職業；布拉德皮特演的那個bastard太有個性了，處亂不驚，渾身是膽，很有領導才能；他召集反納粹游擊隊時的那段演說太讓人印象深刻了，特別是這一句——「你們一旦加入我的部隊，就personally欠了我一筆債務，你們每人欠我一百張納粹頭皮；我要我的頭皮！」————布拉德皮特曾經在《燃情歲月》里扮演過一個崇尚印第安武士傳統的人，崇尚扒人頭皮。。。。估計他幹上癮了。。。。
那個蘇珊娜，穿著鮮紅的連衣裙，依在圓形窗戶前，看著外面鮮紅的納粹黨旗思索著復仇。。。。這時候響起的那段音樂，渾厚的男低音-——————太爽了！震撼！導演實在是有才！
還發現一個事情——小酒館的那個槍戰，很快，讓人眼花繚亂；幾秒鍾就硝煙散盡—— 僅有一個德國兵安然無恙的倖存。。。。。我慢動作放了好多遍——————發現——其實游擊隊這一方是有機會贏的，關鍵是游擊隊里那個會說墨尼黑方言的那個人誤把酒吧老闆當成是敵人了，朝酒吧老闆放了一槍。。。。那一槍本可以打向最後倖存的那個德國兵。。。。。
那段槍戰太刺激了，還有槍戰前的偽裝被蓋世太保識破的過程，太刺激了；
還有就是這部電影很可貴的地方————有好幾次體現出，德國士兵是很愛國的。。。。。。
㈥ 急需影評的英語作文 初中
today i saw a movie named THE LEGEND OF 1900.
it touched me so much that i narrowly began crying.
the movie is about a man who was born on the ship and played piano on it till the time the ship was destroyed and he himself died.the lonely man played piano throughout his life and he only had one friend,but that is a real friend.he once fell in love with a girl,but he did't own the courage to express his feeling.the movie is so great for it build a character who deeply touched everybody who watched the film.and the actor performance is also very natural.
it is a good film which is worth watching,so i hope every one can go to see the film and feel the heart of the man in the film.
希望能幫上忙哈～～
㈦ 英語作文和觀後感
先把它的主要內容寫下來，然後談談文章的中心思想、要麼寫自己的感想。
觀後感，就是看了一部電影或電視劇後，把具體感受和得到的啟示寫成的文章。所謂「感」，可以是從作品中領悟出來的道理或精湛的思想，可以是受作品中的內容啟發而引起的思考與聯想，可以是因觀看而激發的決心和理想，也可以是因觀看而引起的對社會上某些丑惡現象的抨擊。觀後感的表達方式靈活多樣，基本屬於議論范疇，但寫法不同於一般議論文，因為它必須是在觀看後的基礎上發感想。要寫好有體驗、有見解、有感情、有新意的觀後感，必須注意以下幾點：
一、要將重點放在一個「感」字上
不少同學開始寫觀後感，往往將「觀」的內容寫得很長，總愛把故事情節從頭到尾加以介紹，生怕讀者不知其內容，而發表「感」的文字卻很少，如一個同學在寫《一個獨生女的故事》觀後感時，先將整個故事從頭到尾講述了一遍，先寫張鳴鳴如何品學兼優，再寫張鳴鳴的父親突然去世，母親因承受不了這一打擊而重病纏身；接著寫張鳴鳴從自己學梳頭開始，怎樣擔負起繁重的家務，接受一個個嚴酷的考驗，然後寫她在社會的幫助下一天天長大。最後結尾時才寫到：我要向張鳴鳴學習，不被困難所屈服，從小要學做自己能做的事。針對這樣一篇結構的觀後感，我首先肯定他看得很認真，記住了影片的情節，但從觀後感的文體要求上看，是不合格的。因全文只有最後一句「感」，雖然這句「感」的內容貼切，但文章沒抓住「感」這個重點，寫偏了，好像一篇電影內容簡介。我強調學生應以「感」為主，從文字上看，「感」的內容大約占影片主要內容的四、五倍。文中適當引用影片內容，是為「感」服務的。因此，引用電影內容只要三言兩語，不要具體敘述，更不要什麼細致的描寫。觀看了《偉人愛迪生》後，我要求學生：誰能用最簡單的語言概括故事內容?有個同學說：本片主要講述愛迪生從一個身無分文的打掃地下室的清潔工成長為一個舉世聞名的大科學家的過程；還有個學生補充說：主要講了他發明電燈的事，他給全世界帶來了光明。我將兩位同學的發言進行比較：前者准確些，後者只是無數發明中最突出的一項，並肯定他們能用簡短的語言概括故事內容，然後讓學生抓住一點談自己的感受。如愛迪生刻苦鑽研的精神，不怕失敗的精神，敢於創新的精神等，這樣寫出來的文章就克服以敘述故事為主的毛病了，不僅突出「感」字，而且讀後能感人。
二、「感」是重點，不等於離開「觀」
有的同學寫觀後感，只是在開頭提一下「觀了某部影片後，大有啟發」等字樣，以後就脫離了原片，說上一通自己的感想，牛頭不對馬嘴，無實際意義。要讓「觀」和「感」相吻合。如觀了《火燒圓明園》，我進行指導後讓學生先打草稿，然後收了部分習作，發現有的同學「感」與「觀」內在聯系不緊，有的根本無聯系，他們寫了一下影片內容後，就寫到日本帝國主義侵略中國，如何在中國燒、殺、搶。抓不住影片的主題思想。為了解決這個問題，我從中找了幾篇寫的好點兒的進行評講、引路。有個叫王天波的同學在題為《落後就要挨打》一文的結尾時這樣寫到：影片中那幾根石柱至今還挺立在圓明園的廢墟上，彷彿在警示人們「落後就要挨打」，我們作為新中國的接班人，一定要學好本領，把祖國建設得更加強大，不讓歷史悲劇重演。在這段結尾中，習作者再次將「觀」到的「幾根石柱」抓住，發表「落後就要挨打」的「感」，使文章全文一體，使「感」發於「觀」、「觀」服務於「感」。
三、要聯系實際而「感」
要寫好「感」就該聯系實際，深入發揮，把自己的「感」寫深、寫透。
這里的實際，不是單指自我實際，還包括他人實際，社會實際。
㈧ 求一篇 電影 英文影評！
If you've ever been poor, this movie may be hard to watch. It depicts poverty in America in gut wrenchingly accurate ways. I've been as poor as Chris Gardner, and, like him, I've been poor among very rich people in the Bay Area while trying to work my way up.
Chris Gardner is a loving father and failing businessman. He is chosen for a competitive internship at Dean Witter, a stock brokerage. The internship, which offers Chris a very long shot at a better life, doesn't pay any salary. Chris has to live without a salary for six months while risking just about everything for that long shot gamble.
Chris is really smart. He can solve a Rubrik's cube in minutes. But, he's poor. Poverty, like an octopus, keeps trying to suck him down to the bottom, and make him stay there.
His car is towed. His wife walks out on him, leaving him with a five year old son. He is arrested for unpaid traffic tickets. He becomes homeless. He has to rely on a homeless shelter.
All this while, he must appear for work in the morning in a suit and tie, and be ready to charm some of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the Bay Area. These people take wealth so much for granted that two of them stiff him for cab fare.
Having lived through similar experiences, I cringed throughout this movie. My stomach hurt. I winced. I cried. I hugged my knees to my chest.
The movie is very accurate, but painful to watch. I hope a lot of rich people, who think that they understand poverty, see it.
This movie will be politically controversial. First of all, it doesn't touch the race issue with a ten foot pole. For example, when Chris appears to stiff a taxi driver for fare (it was really the rich white guy who failed to pay), the taxi driver never uses the "n" word. In real life, I think he probably would have.
Is the movie afraid to talk about race, or does it not want to? I don't know, but I know that some will protest the movie's not shoving race in the movie goer's face. I'm not one of those people. The movie's approach to race -- treating it as almost incidental -- worked for me. As a poor white person, I can tell you that poor white people face the same obstacles Chris did.
Second, does the movie sell the message that if you work hard, you will succeed, no matter what, and does that message tell the truth about success in America? I think that the movie is open to interpretation. Some will see it as an indictment of poverty in America. The scene of carefree rich people driving past the line to get into a homeless shelter is pretty devastating. Other people will become angry because they believe that the movie's depiction of hard work leading to rewards, in some cases, is too facile. I disagree, but that's what you'll hear.
Third, is this movie meant to chastise black men who abandon their children? Chris is a role model exactly because he moves heaven and earth to be a good father to his son. This will be debated back and forth.
The movie has a big philosophical statement to make, that has been lost on many reviewers, for example, Richard Schickel in TIME.
Chris is shown running throughout the movie. Remember the title of the movie: "The PURSUIT of Happiness." Chris places emphasis on "pursuit." Jefferson, when he penned the Declaration of Independence, did not promise Americans happiness, but only the right to pursue it. Chris says, at one point in the movie, paraphrase, "I am happy right now. It is a fleeting moment." We experience happiness in eyeblinks. The rest of the time we, like Chris, are chasing after it.
㈨ 一篇初二英語作文:一篇影評(60詞)
My favorite movie is "kung fu panda,". This movie is about the beautiful scenery in the pinggu and, there lived a group of wulin. But the difference is, and the wulin, pinggu are all animals. The panda the treasure is probably one of the valley will not the fighting skill of residents. And fat and slow the treasure in the father of work in business noodle, father hope the treasure can inherit, however the treasure is a noodle who is learning in the valley, and become the first fighting skill of kung fu masters. But it has always been lazy to bo, it was just a distant dream only. The tortoise master recently had the foreboding: the great dragon snow leopard, is about to break through the trap it DuoNian of imprisonment, dragon after prison will surely come and pinggu revenge. So, and will immediately pinggu meeting
譯文：我最喜歡的電影是《功夫熊貓》。這部電影是關於平谷美麗的風景和，住著一群武林。但不同的是，和武林廣場、平谷是所有的動物。熊貓寶藏是山谷的大概之一將沒有戰斗能力的居民。脂肪和緩慢珍寶在父親工作的業務面，父親希望寶藏可以繼承，但是寶藏是在谷，學習的面條和成為功夫大師的第一次的戰鬥技能。但它一直是懶到博，它是只是一個遙遠的夢只。烏龜大師最近有種不詳的預感：大龍雪豹，是要突破它經過多年監禁、龍後監獄一定會和平谷復仇的陷阱。所以，並立即將平谷會議
㈩ 英文影評
《阿甘正傳》觀後感（英文） To be honest, this is the first time I ever write a review of a movie. And this beginning is a tough one—with an Oscar winner as its subject, surrounding which there is considerably controversy over the values it has questioned, the thoughts it tried to implicitly convey, and the art of the movie itself. Forrest Gump mould incarnation of virtue is honest keeping one』s word , conscientiously , brave paying attention to motioning among film. In the film, Forrest Gump is a very pure image, but Jenny has become the degenerate symbol . And write the great discrepancy originally in this. To all that narrated, since beginning all behave with a kind of tender feeling and well-meaning attitude after all for the film, having even joined poesy composition, this makes the film seem soft and have no injury. The film advocates to traditional moral concept and embodiment. Make film apt to accept by people, director superb lay out skill and film application of language make the film very attractive too. Success with commercial for film content of the film has given security, and the treatment on director』s art makes the film more excellent, this is reason that the film succeeds. It was the box-office hits the most in that year to become U.S.A. in < Forrest Gump>. 《阿甘正傳》影評 阿甘是一個出生很不幸的人，通常人們總是認為這種人不能成功， 在做任何事情過程中。 但是，相反，這個不幸的人已經取得許多難以置信的成功，他是一個足球明星，一名戰爭英雄和一個百萬富翁！ 阿甘在影片中被塑造成了美德的化身，誠實、守信、認真、勇敢而重視感情。在影片中，阿甘是十分純潔的形象，而珍妮則成了墮落的象徵。這與原著有著極大的出入。對於所敘述的一切，影片自始自終都是以一種溫情和善意的態度來表現的，甚至還加入了詩意化的成分，這使得影片顯得柔和而無傷害性。影片對傳統道德觀念的宣揚和體現。使影片變得易為人們所接受，導演高超的編排技巧和電影語言的運用也使影片十分吸引人。影片的內容為影片商業上的成功提供了保證，而導演藝術上的處理也使得影片更加精彩，這就是影片成功的原因所在。《阿甘正傳》成了美國當年最為賣座的電影之一。
還有一篇
Forrest Gump is so unique because of the character Forrest Gump himself, who has a low IQ of only 75. I love that Forrest doesn't lose his innocence and purity throughout the movie, or maybe he just can't but either way, this shows you don't need to be evil or really intelligent to be recognised or successful. It is just a movie, so maybe it doesn't work like that in reality. What that simply means is that the acting and story of this film was incredibly touching on a real level. And in my definition that's what a good movie should be able to do.