① 關於打電話的英語對話作文。
K:
who
is
this
？
凱西:這是誰?
L:This
is
LiuHong.
May
i
speak
to
Mr
K
?
李:這是LiuHong。我可以和K先生說話嗎?
K:Speaking.
凱西:說話。
L:i
hope
i
donot
disturb
you.
we
are
very
glad
to
invite
you
to
partipate
in
our
English
discusting
in
our
school
on
friday
moring
.
are
you
available
?
我希望我不要打擾你。我們很高興邀請你參加partipate在周五早上我們學校不我們的英語惡心。你可用嗎?
K:sorry.
i
canot
hear
you
clearly
？
pardon
？
凱西:對不起。我不能聽清楚你?再說一遍?
L:
OK.
I
say
I
invite
you
to
go
our
school
for
English
Discussion
on
Friday
moring
。
L:好吧。我說我邀請你去我們學校周五早上英語討論。
K:
oh.
that
is
fine.
I
will
be
on
time
.
凱西:哦。這是很好。我將准時。
L:
thank
you.
See
you
friday.
李:謝謝你。星期五見。
K:see
you
.
凱西:見到你。
② 英語對話作文
「Don't scientists have a responsibility to use animals in order to find cures for human diseases?」
Ecating people and encouraging them to avoid fat and cholesterol, quit smoking, rece alcohol and other drug consumption, exercise regularly, and clean up the environment will save more human lives and prevent more human suffering than all the animal tests in the world. Animal tests are primitive, and modern technology and human clinical tests are much more effective and reliable.
Even if we had no alternative to using animals, which is not the case, animal testing would still be ethically unacceptable. As George Bernard Shaw once said, 「You do not settle whether an experiment is justified or not by merely showing that it is of some use. The distinction is not between useful and useless experiments, but between barbarous and civilized behaviour.」 After all, there are probably some medical problems that can only be cured by testing on unwilling humans, but we don』t conct such tests because we recognize that it would be wrong to do so.
「If we didn』t use animals, wouldn』t we have to test new drugs on people?」
The choice isn』t between animals and people. There is no guarantee that drugs are safe—even if they have been tested on animals—because the physiological differences between humans and other animals prevent the results of animal tests from being accurately extrapolated to humans. Some drugs that have been approved through animal tests can cause serious and unexpected side effects for humans. A 2002 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that in the last 25 years, more than 50 FDA-approved drugs had to be taken off the market or relabeled because they caused 「adverse reactions.」 In 2000 alone, the prescription drugs removed from the market were the popular heartburn drug Propulsid (removed because it caused 「fatal heart rhythm abnormalities」), the diabetes drug Rezulin (「removed after causing liver failure」), and the irritable-bowel-syndrome treatment Lotronex (「removed for causing fatal constipation and colitis」). According to the study』s lead author, 「Millions of patients are exposed to potentially unsafe drugs each year.」
If the pharmaceutical instry switched from animal experiments to quantum pharmacology and in vitro tests, we would be better protected from harmful drugs, not less protected.
「If we didn』t test on animals, how would we conct medical research?」
Human clinical and epidemiological studies, studies on cadavers, and computer simulations are faster, more reliable, less expensive, and more humane than animal tests. Ingenious scientists have used human brain cells to develop a model 「microbrain」 that can be used to study tumors and have also come up with artificial skin and bone marrow. Instead of killing animals, we can now test irritancy on egg membranes, proce vaccines from cell cultures, and perform pregnancy tests using blood samples. As Gordon Baxter, cofounder of Pharmagene Laboratories—a company that uses only human tissue and computers to develop and test its drugs—says, 「If you have information on human genes, what』s the point of going back to animals?」
「Doesn't animal experimentation help animals by advancing veterinary science?」
The point is not whether animal experimentation can be useful to animals or humans; the point is that we do not have the moral right to inflict unnecessary suffering on those who are at our mercy. Saying that it』s acceptable to experiment on animals to advance veterinary science is like saying that it』s acceptable to experiment on poor children to benefit rich ones.
「Don』t medical students have to dissect animals?」
No, they don』t. In fact, more and more medical students are becoming conscientious objectors who choose to learn by assisting experienced surgeons instead of by using animals. In Great Britain, it is against the law for medical students to practice surgery on animals, and British physicians are just as competent as those who were ecated elsewhere. Many of the leading U.S. medical schools, including Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, now use innovative, clinical teaching methods instead of cruel animal laboratories. Harvard, for instance, offers a cardiac-anesthesia practicum in which students observe human heart bypass operations instead of performing terminal surgery on dogs. The Harvard staff members who developed this practicum have recommended that it be implemented elsewhere.
「Should we throw out all the drugs that were developed and tested on animals? Would you refuse to take them?」
Unfortunately, a number of things in our society came about through the exploitation of others. For instance, many of the roads that we drive on were built by slaves. We can』t change the past; those who have already suffered and died are lost. But what we can do is change the future by using non-animal research methods from now on.
「Don't scientists care about the animals they experiment on? Doesn't their research depend on the animals』 well-being?」
Investigations at even the most prestigious institutions show that this is simply not the case. At the City of Hope in California, one of the country』s most prominent research facilities, animals starved to death and drowned in their own feces. Many experimenters become calloused after years of research and don』t see the animals』 suffering. They treat animals like disposable tools and consider proper animal care to be too expensive.
「Don't peer-review and animal-care committees prevent animal cruelty at institutions?」
No, because many such committees are composed mainly or completely of people who have vested interests in the continuation of animal experimentation. Members of the public were not allowed access to committee meetings until lawsuits were filed.
「Cats and dogs are killed in pounds anyway, so why not let them be used in experiments to save lives?」
A painless death at an animal shelter is a far cry from a life of severe pain and deprivation and an agonizing death in a laboratory.
「Would you support an experiment that would sacrifice 10 animals to save 10,000 people?」
No. Look at it another way: Suppose that the only way to save 10,000 people was to experiment on one mentally challenged orphan. If saving people is the goal, wouldn』t that be worth it? Most people would agree that it would be wrong to sacrifice one human for the 「greater good」 of others because it would violate that indivial』s rights, but when it comes to sacrificing animals, the assumption is that human beings have rights and animals do not. Yet there is no logical reason to deny animals the same rights that protect indivial humans from being sacrificed for the common good.
「What about experiments in which animals are observed and not harmed?」
If there really is no harm, we don』t object. But 「no harm」 means that animals aren』t isolated in barren, cold steel cages because even confinement causes stress and fear, as shown by the differences in blood pressure between caged and free animals. Caged animals also suffer because they are prevented from performing their normal behaviors and social interactions.
「If you were in a fire and could save either your child or your dog, who would you choose?」
I would save my child, but that』s just instinct. A dog would save her pup. Regardless, my choice proves nothing about the moral legitimacy of animal experiments. I might save my own child instead of my neighbor』s, but that hardly proves that experimentation on my neighbor』s child is acceptable.
「Why Should Animals Have Rights?」
Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth—a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. We believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. For more information, click here.
EU proposes to strengthen protection of animals used in scientific experiments
The European Commission on Wednesday proposed legislation to strengthen the protection of animals used in scientific experiments and to minimize the number of animals being tested on.
The proposal, which intends to strengthen existing European Union (EU) legislation, asks ethical evaluations to be carried out before projects using animals are authorized and lays down minimum requirements on housing and animal care.
The proposed directive covers all live non-human vertebrate animals plus certain other species likely to experience pain. The use of non-human primates is subject to restrictions, and the use of great apes -- chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans -- is banned in scientific proceres. Only when survival of the species itself is at stake, or in the case of an unexpected outbreak of a life-threatening or debilitating disease in human beings, can a member state exceptionally be granted permission for their use.
The proposal seeks to ensure that animals are used only where no other means are available. Their use must be fully justifiable and the expected benefits must outweigh the harm caused to the animals. The proposal would also ensure that animals receive suitable care and treatment such as appropriately sized cages and an environment adapted to each species.
The proposal would also require projects involving animals to be authorized by a competent authority before they can go ahead. Organizations wishing to breed, supply or use animals would be obliged to seek authorization for their activities and for the personnel working with the animals.
"It is absolutely important to steer away from testing on animals. Scientific research must focus on finding alternative methods to animal testing, but where alternatives are not available the situation of animals still used in experiments must be improved," said EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas.
③ 英語對話作文求幫忙！
A: Hello
B: Hello,this is 你的名字（例如Andy） is 打給對方人的名字（Alice） there？
A：Speaking
B：oh。hi Alice，Im calling to ask if youd like to swim。
A：That sounds good。When？
B: How about this Friday？
A：How about this sunday？
B：OK
A:See
B：bye
如果版有什麼問題的權話~可以繼續向我提問
---------------------------------------------
---如果滿意記得及時採納謝謝------
---------------------------------------------
④ 簡單英語對話作文帶翻譯
marry：hello!paul
lucy.
paul
lucy:hi!marry.
marry：how
was
your
weekends？
paul：it
is
too
boring，i
did
my
homework
and
watched
tv
the
whole
days.
lucy：oh！it
is
terrible！i
was
lucky，i
went
to
the
aquarium
with
my
brother，i
saw
many
seals
and
sharks.
marry：it
is
wonderful！
paul：how
about
you，mary？
marry：it
was
boring，too.
lucy：how
bad
the
weekends
you
have！
翻譯：
marry：露西，保羅，你們好！
paul
lucy：瑪麗
你好！
marry：你們的周末怎麼樣？
paul：我的周末很無聊，我整天都在做我的家庭作業和看電視。
lucy：太可憐了，我比較幸運，我和我的哥哥去了水族館，我看見了許多的海豹和鯊魚。
marry：太精彩了！
paul：瑪麗，你的周末怎麼樣呢？
marry：一樣很無聊。
lucy：你們過了多麼糟糕的周末啊！
就只有過去式，還有個感嘆句，單詞學到第8單元就可以了
⑤ 英語對話作文
問號與感嘆號
這是三個從問號到感嘆號的思考過程。
第一個問號是，為什麼語文考不出一百分?
記得我上一年級時，特別喜歡上語文課，沈老師常表揚我拼音基礎打得牢，考試常常一百分。可是，不知道為什麼，到了三年級下，成績漸漸下降，不要說考一百分，能考出九十五分已十分難得，盡管如此，爸爸仍然鼓勵我，當我考試有進步時，他就顯得格外興奮，晚飯時一定要喝上二兩。我也曾經十分苦惱，為什麼考試越來越難呢?冷靜地想一想，分析原因，我認為主要是三年級開始有了作文，作文能得滿分幾乎不太可能，另外，從考試卷上看，基礎部分扣分較多，這與我基礎打得不牢有關。詞語掌握不夠全面，積累少;語文預習不扎實，有時圖速度快，囫圇吞棗。
第二個問號是，為什麼數學考不出一百分?
有一段時間我對數學課不太喜歡，上課精力不集中。現在雖然有點兒進步，但對新知識仍不能熟練掌握，考試時不能舉一反三;在家裡預習不能很好堅持，練習也不多，爸爸也不主張打題海戰，可我總覺得各類題目做的不多、眼界不寬。
第三個問號是，為什麼英語不能經常考一百分?
其實我對英語是比較喜歡的，有時也能考一百分，就是不經常。爸爸也幫助我分析過，主要是基本功不扎實，單詞記的快也忘的快，沒有做到溫故知新;另一方面，聽的少、寫的少、說的更少。
三個問號使我想起了醫生給病人看病，治病前，先要作出准確的診斷，才能拿出治療方案。剛才談到的三個問號也就自然引發出了三個感嘆號，其實是我針對三門課的學習方案和考出好成績的決心。
學好語文必須提前一步!老師要求預習，做到全面掌握;老師要求熟讀，做到開始背誦;老師要求背誦，做到已經能夠熟背。總之，嚴格要求，提前一步。
學好數學必須舉一反三!緊緊抓住課堂45分鍾，聽進去，真正理解，概念清晰;多練習，會運用，真正掌握，能夠舉一反三。
學好英語必須多記多用!單詞積累很重要，堅持每天背上幾個單詞，日積月累，詞彙就豐富了;多聽讀、多運用，堅持每天晨讀，有時間多與喜歡英語的同學交流，養成英語對話習慣，英語考試滿分不是夢。
這是我對於自己成績的反思，也是從三個問號變成三個感嘆號的過程。我希望通過這樣的反思可以讓我的學習成績有所提高。
⑥ 英語作文對話關於采訪
(Q: question 問題） （A: answer 答案）Q:How are you doing, Jackie Chan!A:Q:How do you become a famous movie star?A:Q:What's your favorite kinds of movie?A:Q: Are you going to make more movies?A:Q: Can you talk abou how you develope your movie skills?A:按這個形式,你可以加多幾個問題,A那裡是成龍的回回答~希望對你答有幫助~!
⑦ 關於上學的英語作文對話
k:
who
is
this
？
凱西:這是誰?
l:this
is
liuhong.
may
i
speak
to
mr
k
?
李:這是liuhong。我可以和k先生說話嗎?
k:speaking.
凱西:說話。
l:i
hope
i
donot
disturb
you.
we
are
very
glad
to
invite
you
to
partipate
in
our
english
discusting
in
our
school
on
friday
moring
.
are
you
available
?
我希望我不要打擾你。我們很高興邀請你參加在周五早上我們學校不我們的英語惡心。你可用嗎?
k:sorry.
i
canot
hear
you
clearly
？
pardon
？
凱西:對不起。我不能聽清楚你?再說一遍?
l:
ok.
i
say
i
invite
you
to
go
our
school
for
english
discussion
on
friday
moring
。
l:好吧。我說我邀請你去我們學校周五早上英語討論。
k:
oh.
that
is
fine.
i
will
be
on
time
.
凱西:哦。這是很好。我將准時。
l:
thank
you.
see
you
friday.
李:謝謝你。星期五見。
k:see
you
.
凱西:見到你。
⑧ 英語作文2篇信3篇對話
大街上每一家商店裡的營業員和老闆都在辛勤地工作，他們都熱情地對待顧客，從不對顧客們翻白眼、說臟話。不管是什麼節假日，這些商店裡的營業員和老闆從不休息。他們不僅僅是為了賺錢，還為了使我們得到更好的服務。
不僅各個商店、超市裡的營業員在國慶節辛勤地工作，在大街上還有一群不知勞累的工作者——環衛工人。環衛工人每天都起早貪黑地勞動，就算在國慶節也從不休息。環衛工人每天都在為我們的城市做出貢獻。大家試想一下，如果沒有環衛工人，我們的生活會怎麼樣：到處是垃圾，臭氣難聞……我們一天也離不開他們，而他們每天都在工作，都在環保，都在勞累。他們為了什麼?還不是為了讓我們有一個清潔的生活環境，讓我們能過一個舒適的國慶。
⑨ 英語作文關於科目的對話
Maybe someday I will become a rich man.I will own a lot of wealth then I will do something I espect to do for a long time.First at all I will donate some money to poor family that let the child can go to school to learn,the old people can enjoy their life.Secondly,I will spend some money to make my parent life better.the last but not least is do some investment to contribute to our country's economics.
⑩ 簡單英語對話作文帶翻譯
The National Day is coming!
國慶節就要到啦！
Jane：Yeah, we'll have a vacation for seven days. What do you plan on doing ring the holiday?
是啊，我們可以過個七天長假了。放假你都打算干嗎啊？
Ben：I plan on going sightseeing.
我想去旅遊。
Jane：Oh, Gosh! There will be so many tourists ring that time. Why don't you change your plans?
天啊，這個時候旅遊景點的人肯定特多。干嗎不換個時間去？
Ben：I know, but it's not that easy for me to have such a long holiday to travel. What about your plans?
這個我也知道，可是難得有個這么長的假期可以去旅遊啊。你打算做什麼呢？
Jane：Me? I intend to stay at home for the whole seven days and have a good rest.
我啊？就打算在家待七天，好好兒休息休息。