① 簡單英語對話作文帶翻譯
marry：hello!paul
lucy.
paul
lucy:hi!marry.
marry：how
was
your
weekends？
paul：it
is
too
boring，i
did
my
homework
and
watched
tv
the
whole
days.
lucy：oh！it
is
terrible！i
was
lucky，i
went
to
the
aquarium
with
my
brother，i
saw
many
seals
and
sharks.
marry：it
is
wonderful！
paul：how
about
you，mary？
marry：it
was
boring，too.
lucy：how
bad
the
weekends
you
have！
翻譯：
marry：露西，保羅，你們好！
paul
lucy：瑪麗
你好！
marry：你們的周末怎麼樣？
paul：我的周末很無聊，我整天都在做我的家庭作業和看電視。
lucy：太可憐了，我比較幸運，我和我的哥哥去了水族館，我看見了許多的海豹和鯊魚。
marry：太精彩了！
paul：瑪麗，你的周末怎麼樣呢？
marry：一樣很無聊。
lucy：你們過了多麼糟糕的周末啊！
就只有過去式，還有個感嘆句，單詞學到第8單元就可以了
② 關於祝賀的兩人對話英語作文
Have you done it? 你做完抄了嗎/
Yes, I have. 是的， 我做完了
Wow, how capable you are. You made it. 哇，你是多麼能幹啊，你做到了。
Thank you. You know, in order to make it, I work so hard. 謝謝，你知道，為了成功，我很努力的。
Yeah, you did. If not, how you can do it. 嗯，確實，不然你怎麼能做到了。
Wah, You really know me. 哇，你可真了解我。
Right, congratulations. 是的，恭喜你。
Yeah, I will do it better. 嗯，我會做的更好的。
You will。 你會的。
I hope you will be successful,too.也希望你能成功。
Thank you, I will. 謝謝，我會的。
En. 嗯
③ 英語對話作文
「Don't scientists have a responsibility to use animals in order to find cures for human diseases?」
Ecating people and encouraging them to avoid fat and cholesterol, quit smoking, rece alcohol and other drug consumption, exercise regularly, and clean up the environment will save more human lives and prevent more human suffering than all the animal tests in the world. Animal tests are primitive, and modern technology and human clinical tests are much more effective and reliable.
Even if we had no alternative to using animals, which is not the case, animal testing would still be ethically unacceptable. As George Bernard Shaw once said, 「You do not settle whether an experiment is justified or not by merely showing that it is of some use. The distinction is not between useful and useless experiments, but between barbarous and civilized behaviour.」 After all, there are probably some medical problems that can only be cured by testing on unwilling humans, but we don』t conct such tests because we recognize that it would be wrong to do so.
「If we didn』t use animals, wouldn』t we have to test new drugs on people?」
The choice isn』t between animals and people. There is no guarantee that drugs are safe—even if they have been tested on animals—because the physiological differences between humans and other animals prevent the results of animal tests from being accurately extrapolated to humans. Some drugs that have been approved through animal tests can cause serious and unexpected side effects for humans. A 2002 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that in the last 25 years, more than 50 FDA-approved drugs had to be taken off the market or relabeled because they caused 「adverse reactions.」 In 2000 alone, the prescription drugs removed from the market were the popular heartburn drug Propulsid (removed because it caused 「fatal heart rhythm abnormalities」), the diabetes drug Rezulin (「removed after causing liver failure」), and the irritable-bowel-syndrome treatment Lotronex (「removed for causing fatal constipation and colitis」). According to the study』s lead author, 「Millions of patients are exposed to potentially unsafe drugs each year.」
If the pharmaceutical instry switched from animal experiments to quantum pharmacology and in vitro tests, we would be better protected from harmful drugs, not less protected.
「If we didn』t test on animals, how would we conct medical research?」
Human clinical and epidemiological studies, studies on cadavers, and computer simulations are faster, more reliable, less expensive, and more humane than animal tests. Ingenious scientists have used human brain cells to develop a model 「microbrain」 that can be used to study tumors and have also come up with artificial skin and bone marrow. Instead of killing animals, we can now test irritancy on egg membranes, proce vaccines from cell cultures, and perform pregnancy tests using blood samples. As Gordon Baxter, cofounder of Pharmagene Laboratories—a company that uses only human tissue and computers to develop and test its drugs—says, 「If you have information on human genes, what』s the point of going back to animals?」
「Doesn't animal experimentation help animals by advancing veterinary science?」
The point is not whether animal experimentation can be useful to animals or humans; the point is that we do not have the moral right to inflict unnecessary suffering on those who are at our mercy. Saying that it』s acceptable to experiment on animals to advance veterinary science is like saying that it』s acceptable to experiment on poor children to benefit rich ones.
「Don』t medical students have to dissect animals?」
No, they don』t. In fact, more and more medical students are becoming conscientious objectors who choose to learn by assisting experienced surgeons instead of by using animals. In Great Britain, it is against the law for medical students to practice surgery on animals, and British physicians are just as competent as those who were ecated elsewhere. Many of the leading U.S. medical schools, including Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, now use innovative, clinical teaching methods instead of cruel animal laboratories. Harvard, for instance, offers a cardiac-anesthesia practicum in which students observe human heart bypass operations instead of performing terminal surgery on dogs. The Harvard staff members who developed this practicum have recommended that it be implemented elsewhere.
「Should we throw out all the drugs that were developed and tested on animals? Would you refuse to take them?」
Unfortunately, a number of things in our society came about through the exploitation of others. For instance, many of the roads that we drive on were built by slaves. We can』t change the past; those who have already suffered and died are lost. But what we can do is change the future by using non-animal research methods from now on.
「Don't scientists care about the animals they experiment on? Doesn't their research depend on the animals』 well-being?」
Investigations at even the most prestigious institutions show that this is simply not the case. At the City of Hope in California, one of the country』s most prominent research facilities, animals starved to death and drowned in their own feces. Many experimenters become calloused after years of research and don』t see the animals』 suffering. They treat animals like disposable tools and consider proper animal care to be too expensive.
「Don't peer-review and animal-care committees prevent animal cruelty at institutions?」
No, because many such committees are composed mainly or completely of people who have vested interests in the continuation of animal experimentation. Members of the public were not allowed access to committee meetings until lawsuits were filed.
「Cats and dogs are killed in pounds anyway, so why not let them be used in experiments to save lives?」
A painless death at an animal shelter is a far cry from a life of severe pain and deprivation and an agonizing death in a laboratory.
「Would you support an experiment that would sacrifice 10 animals to save 10,000 people?」
No. Look at it another way: Suppose that the only way to save 10,000 people was to experiment on one mentally challenged orphan. If saving people is the goal, wouldn』t that be worth it? Most people would agree that it would be wrong to sacrifice one human for the 「greater good」 of others because it would violate that indivial』s rights, but when it comes to sacrificing animals, the assumption is that human beings have rights and animals do not. Yet there is no logical reason to deny animals the same rights that protect indivial humans from being sacrificed for the common good.
「What about experiments in which animals are observed and not harmed?」
If there really is no harm, we don』t object. But 「no harm」 means that animals aren』t isolated in barren, cold steel cages because even confinement causes stress and fear, as shown by the differences in blood pressure between caged and free animals. Caged animals also suffer because they are prevented from performing their normal behaviors and social interactions.
「If you were in a fire and could save either your child or your dog, who would you choose?」
I would save my child, but that』s just instinct. A dog would save her pup. Regardless, my choice proves nothing about the moral legitimacy of animal experiments. I might save my own child instead of my neighbor』s, but that hardly proves that experimentation on my neighbor』s child is acceptable.
「Why Should Animals Have Rights?」
Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth—a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. We believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. For more information, click here.
EU proposes to strengthen protection of animals used in scientific experiments
The European Commission on Wednesday proposed legislation to strengthen the protection of animals used in scientific experiments and to minimize the number of animals being tested on.
The proposal, which intends to strengthen existing European Union (EU) legislation, asks ethical evaluations to be carried out before projects using animals are authorized and lays down minimum requirements on housing and animal care.
The proposed directive covers all live non-human vertebrate animals plus certain other species likely to experience pain. The use of non-human primates is subject to restrictions, and the use of great apes -- chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans -- is banned in scientific proceres. Only when survival of the species itself is at stake, or in the case of an unexpected outbreak of a life-threatening or debilitating disease in human beings, can a member state exceptionally be granted permission for their use.
The proposal seeks to ensure that animals are used only where no other means are available. Their use must be fully justifiable and the expected benefits must outweigh the harm caused to the animals. The proposal would also ensure that animals receive suitable care and treatment such as appropriately sized cages and an environment adapted to each species.
The proposal would also require projects involving animals to be authorized by a competent authority before they can go ahead. Organizations wishing to breed, supply or use animals would be obliged to seek authorization for their activities and for the personnel working with the animals.
"It is absolutely important to steer away from testing on animals. Scientific research must focus on finding alternative methods to animal testing, but where alternatives are not available the situation of animals still used in experiments must be improved," said EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas.
④ 初一年級英語兩人購物對話作文帶翻譯
： Can I have a look at that digital camera please?
Customer： 請問，我能看看那個數碼相機嗎?
Shop Assistant： Yes of course. This is a really good one actually.
Shop Assistant： 當然了。這相機挺不錯的。
Customer： How much does it cost?
Customer： 多少錢?
Shop Assistant： This one is 1500 yuan.
Shop Assistant： 這個嘛，1500 元。
Customer： It looks pretty good. I think I'll take it.
Customer： 看上去滿不錯的，我買了。
Shop Assistant： Would you like anything else?
Shop Assistant： 你還要賣其他東西嗎?
Customer： That's all thank you.
Customer： 不要了，謝謝。
⑤ 關於愛好的倆人對話的英語作文帶翻譯的
have many hobbies, such as playing computer games, reading comics, going shopping. I also like playing pingpong very much. I have a friend. His name is JooZone. He is crazy about playing pingpong, too. If we have free time, we often play pingpong together. 2010 summer holiday, he took me to a sports centre. Then we played pingpong together, but he always lost. He was very angry. He said to me, 「I will beat you in a month.」「. We will have a match at that time.」 After a month, when I talked to him about it, he answered, 「I forgot the thing! I don't want to have a match with you.」 I was very surprised and angry and said, 「Oh, you're a forgetful boy!」
請參考作文地帶提供翻譯：
我有許多愛好，比如玩網游，看漫畫，購物。我也非常喜歡打乒乓球。我有一個朋友，他叫作文地帶，他也是一個乒乓球迷。我們一有時間就一起結伴去打乒乓球。2010年的暑假(Joozone Note:今年暑假)，他帶我去了個運動中心。我們一起打起了乒乓球，但是他老輸球。於是他很不高興。他對我說：「我將在一個月後挑戰你」。我說：「好。我們到時一比高下。」，一個月後的今天，當我問及此事時，他卻說「我已經把這事給忘掉了，我可不想再跟你比了。」我很驚訝也很不高興的說：「你這個人太健忘了！」。
⑥ 《小紅帽》兩人英語作文對話
英語小劇本——《小紅帽》
Little Red Riding Hood
第一場：Little Red Riding Hood家
Mum：(媽媽拿著一個籃子,把桌子上的水果放在籃子里）Little Red Riding Hood:(唱著歌,歡快地跑進來）Hi,mummy,what are you doing?
Mum：（一邊把水果放在籃子里,心事重重地說）Grandma is ill.Here are some apples and bananas for Grandma.Take them to Grandma.
Little Red Riding Hood：（邊提起籃子,邊點頭說）Ok!Mum：（親切地看著Little Red Riding Hood說） Be good.Be careful.
Little Red Riding Hood：Yes ,mummy．Goodbye,mummy.
Mum：Bye-bye.Darling.
第二場：在路上
(一陣輕快的音樂由遠而近,Little Red Riding Hood挎著籃子蹦跳跳地跳到花草旁)
Little Red Riding Hood：Wow!Flowers,how beautiful!（放下籃子採花）One flower ,two flowers,three flowers.
Wolf：（隨著一陣低沉的音樂,Wolf大步地走上台）I am wolf.I am hungry.(做找東西狀,東張西望) Here is a little red riding hood.Hi!Little Red Riding Hood.Where are you going?(做狡猾的樣子和Little Red Riding Hood打招呼)
Little Red Riding Hood：(手摸辮子,天真地回答)To Grandma』s．Grandma is ill.
Wolf：（自言自語）I' ll eat Grandma.But……（對Little Red Riding Hood說）Hey,look!6 little baby cks.
Little Red Riding Hood：(和6隻鴨子隨著音樂翩翩起舞)
Wolf：（悄悄地藏到大樹後）
Little Red Riding Hood：（停止跳舞）Hello!Baby cks,how are you?
Six Ducks：We』 re fine．Thank you． Where are you going?
Little Red Riding Hood：To Grandma』s．Oh,I must go,bye.
Six Ducks：Goodbye．
第三場：Grandma家
Grandma：（喘著氣出場,顫顫悠悠地走到床前,吃力地坐到床邊,喘了幾口,打幾個哈欠,慢吞吞地躺倒在床上.）
Wolf：（從樹後出來,邊走邊說）I am very hungry now.(做找尋的樣子)Where is Grandma』 s house?(高興地對觀眾說)Aha ,it』s here.(敲門)Bang,Bang,Bang．
Grandma：Who is it?
Wolf：（裝出Little Red Riding Hood的聲音,一邊得意地搖動尾巴,一邊說）It』s me.Little Red Riding Hood.
Grandma：(邊說邊起床) Come in,come in.
Wolf：(得意洋洋地走到床邊) Grandma ,I』ll eat you.
Grandma：（驚慌失措地抓緊衣服,瞪著眼睛,邊叫迫從床上滾到地上）
灰狼把外婆吞到了肚子里.
Wolf：（得意地拍拍肚子,翹起大拇指）Yummy!I』ll sleep.
Little Red Riding Hood：(高興地敲門)Grandma．Grandma．
Wolf：(裝扮成Grandma的聲音) Who is it?
Little Red Riding Hood：It』s me.Little Red Riding Hood.What a strange noise!
Wolf：Come in,Come in.
Little Red Riding Hood：(蹦跳著進來,把籃子放在桌子上,走到床前一看,跳回幾步)Oh!What are big ears!
Wolf：I can listen to your sweet voice.
Little Red Riding Hood：Wow!What a big eyes!
Wolf：I can see you pretty face.
Little Red Riding Hood：Oh!What a big hand.
Wolf：I can hug you.
Little Red Riding Hood：（跪在床前,拉起Wolf的手,邊摸邊說）Look!What a big hands?
Wolf：(從床上跳起來說)I can eat you!
Little Red Riding Hood：(拚命地跑)Oh!No!No!
Wolf：（追到Little Red Riding Hood,做吃狀,拍拍肚子說）It』s delicious.I still sleep.I like sleeping.
Hunter：(一邊拿著槍,一邊做尋找狀出場)Where』s the wolf?Look!A door．(推門)The wolf is sleeping.
Wolf：(發出呼呼的響聲)
Hunter：(端起槍想打,又放下)What a big stomach!(摸摸Wolf的肚子)Grandma and Little Red Riding Hood are inside .I must be hurry．(從桌子上拿起剪刀,舉起) Look!Scissors.(做剪Wolf的肚子)Cut,cut,cut.
Little Red Riding Hood/Grandma：Thank you．
Hunter：Grandma ,give me some needles and thread．Little Riding Hood ,Give me some stones．
Grandma：(從桌子上拿來針線)
Little Red Riding Hood：(搬來幾個石頭)One,two,three.
Hunter：(把小石頭裝進Wolf的衣服里)
Grandma：I'll thread it.
Hunter：(拿起槍)Woke up!
Wolf：(起床,兩手托著大肚子)My stomach is so heavy.
Hunter：You big bad wolf,raise your arms!
Wolf：(邊跑邊說) Help!Don』t shot me!
Hunter：（開槍）Bang,bang!
Wolf：(應聲倒下)
Hunter：The bad wolf is dead．
Little Red Riding Hood和Grandma：Yeah!Thank you．
Little Red Riding Hood、Grandma、Hunter（一起鞠躬）:Thank you
⑦ 英語對話作文
問號與感嘆號
這是三個從問號到感嘆號的思考過程。
第一個問號是，為什麼語文考不出一百分?
記得我上一年級時，特別喜歡上語文課，沈老師常表揚我拼音基礎打得牢，考試常常一百分。可是，不知道為什麼，到了三年級下，成績漸漸下降，不要說考一百分，能考出九十五分已十分難得，盡管如此，爸爸仍然鼓勵我，當我考試有進步時，他就顯得格外興奮，晚飯時一定要喝上二兩。我也曾經十分苦惱，為什麼考試越來越難呢?冷靜地想一想，分析原因，我認為主要是三年級開始有了作文，作文能得滿分幾乎不太可能，另外，從考試卷上看，基礎部分扣分較多，這與我基礎打得不牢有關。詞語掌握不夠全面，積累少;語文預習不扎實，有時圖速度快，囫圇吞棗。
第二個問號是，為什麼數學考不出一百分?
有一段時間我對數學課不太喜歡，上課精力不集中。現在雖然有點兒進步，但對新知識仍不能熟練掌握，考試時不能舉一反三;在家裡預習不能很好堅持，練習也不多，爸爸也不主張打題海戰，可我總覺得各類題目做的不多、眼界不寬。
第三個問號是，為什麼英語不能經常考一百分?
其實我對英語是比較喜歡的，有時也能考一百分，就是不經常。爸爸也幫助我分析過，主要是基本功不扎實，單詞記的快也忘的快，沒有做到溫故知新;另一方面，聽的少、寫的少、說的更少。
三個問號使我想起了醫生給病人看病，治病前，先要作出准確的診斷，才能拿出治療方案。剛才談到的三個問號也就自然引發出了三個感嘆號，其實是我針對三門課的學習方案和考出好成績的決心。
學好語文必須提前一步!老師要求預習，做到全面掌握;老師要求熟讀，做到開始背誦;老師要求背誦，做到已經能夠熟背。總之，嚴格要求，提前一步。
學好數學必須舉一反三!緊緊抓住課堂45分鍾，聽進去，真正理解，概念清晰;多練習，會運用，真正掌握，能夠舉一反三。
學好英語必須多記多用!單詞積累很重要，堅持每天背上幾個單詞，日積月累，詞彙就豐富了;多聽讀、多運用，堅持每天晨讀，有時間多與喜歡英語的同學交流，養成英語對話習慣，英語考試滿分不是夢。
這是我對於自己成績的反思，也是從三個問號變成三個感嘆號的過程。我希望通過這樣的反思可以讓我的學習成績有所提高。
⑧ 英語兩人搞笑對話短文，帶翻譯
A:what
is
your
name?
你叫啥名？
B:Hu胡（諧音:誰）
A:you~你
B:Hu~胡
A:Who?誰？
B:yes,
I
am~是，我就是
A:I
want
to
know
your
name我只是想知道回你的名字
B:Hu胡啊答
A:You!你！
B:Yes,
my
name是啊，我的名字啊
A:So
tell
me
about
it那就告訴我啊
B:Hu!胡！
A:You!
What
is
your
name!?
你！你叫啥名？！
B:Hu
is
my
name!我就叫胡
A:O~哦
⑨ 簡單英語對話作文帶翻譯
The National Day is coming!
國慶節就要到啦！
Jane：Yeah, we'll have a vacation for seven days. What do you plan on doing ring the holiday?
是啊，我們可以過個七天長假了。放假你都打算干嗎啊？
Ben：I plan on going sightseeing.
我想去旅遊。
Jane：Oh, Gosh! There will be so many tourists ring that time. Why don't you change your plans?
天啊，這個時候旅遊景點的人肯定特多。干嗎不換個時間去？
Ben：I know, but it's not that easy for me to have such a long holiday to travel. What about your plans?
這個我也知道，可是難得有個這么長的假期可以去旅遊啊。你打算做什麼呢？
Jane：Me? I intend to stay at home for the whole seven days and have a good rest.
我啊？就打算在家待七天，好好兒休息休息。